On the Meaning of Meaning: What Are We Really Looking For?

meaning definitions

If you have ever wondered about meaning, you are not alone in that quest for answers.

The question of meaning is not really one question but actually represents a cipher for a vast number of further questions. And it is by no means obvious whether these questions are answerable at all; neither do we know with any certainty into which area of expertise the responsibility for answering these questions falls.

In response to this observation, I would like to propose that the field of positive psychology is, more than any other field, responsible for dealing with all matters related to meaning.

So far, it has already done a remarkable job; however, it is a gross understatement to claim that we are still in the early stages of our ‘will to meaning.’

Before trying to determine what an answer to this question might look like (such as 42), and even before coming up with a better question to ask, let us decide what ‘meaning’ means.

What are we really looking for?

On the Word ‘Meaning’

To dive into the concept of the meaning (of life), we have to deal with semantics first. That is, we have to make sure that we are on the same page.

First of all, the word ‘meaning’ in English is incredibly confusing. It simply means different things and those different things can mean different things as well. Confused yet? Good.

As Leontiev suggested, German and Russian are more convenient languages to use when we talk about meaning, because they have different words for different kinds of meaning.

(So does the Dutch language by the way). I’ll be a doll and stick to English for now.


So What do We Mean?

The meaning we are focused on when discussing the meaning of life is it’s ‘relevance, significance or value’. Thus, to avoid confusion, a clearer version of these questions is: “What is life’s relevance, significance or value?”

Later in this article, you will discover why that is not the right question either, but it suffices for now.

Philosophers, psychotherapists, and researchers have been dealing with this question for millennia and have identified different kinds of meaning.

Let’s take a look at some of them.


Terrestrial Meaning vs. Cosmic Meaning

In his book Existential Psychotherapy (1980), Yalom introduced cosmic and terrestrial meaning.

Cosmic meaning concerns itself with “whether life, in general, fits into some overall coherent pattern.” According to Yalom, cosmic meaning implies religious or spiritual connotations because it sees meaning as part of a grand scheme, or, a bigger picture superior to that of the individual.


The paradoxical thing is that a grand design seems to offer people comfort. But don’t we have enough to suffer from our consciousness of the inevitability of our own impending death? Cosmic meaning suggests that if there was some sort of thought behind our messy human situation, maybe it would feel lighter. That, to me, is the definition of cruelty.

If there was such a thing as a grand design, the only meaning I would likely experience in a world like that would be from directly and passionately fighting its sadism.

I say that the ‘pattern’ we fit in is nature. Everything else is comforting make-belief. You are free to believe what you think. That’s the beauty of it. Leave a comment below this article if you feel like expressing your beliefs. I’d love to hear them.

Terrestrial meaning, on the other hand, offers an answer to the question: what is the meaning of my life?

In doing so, it whittles the question down to a more manageable size. Essentially, the debate of cosmic verse terrestrial meaning is the one of the ‘external world’ verse the ‘internal world.’

Do we believe that meaning is something imposed on us, or that we are free to create it ourselves? If we like the meaning we create and it guides us, is that enough?


‘The’ Meaning and ‘a’ Meaning

Leontiev differentiates between ‘the’ meaning and ‘a’ meaning.

‘The meaning’ is the single, ultimate integrative reference point inside the person. This type of meaning is similar to terrestrial meaning.

‘A meaning’ represents an element of ever-present mechanisms of the ongoing regulation of behavior and cognition. ‘A meaning’, therefore, is more concerned with affect regulation. It serves as a psychological panacea for successful living and as a tranquilizer against the existential uncertainty mentioned before.

Of course, it is purely subjective and tells us more about human psychology than about life itself.

Although it does not really help us in our quest for meaning, ‘a meaning’ teaches us the importance of placing the meaning of something into some intentional context.

That is exactly what I find so scary about absolute systems/grand designs: they (try to) give context to everything.


Big vs. Small Meaning

I find these terms more poetic in nature, which I appreciate. To me, life is boring when scientific lingo is all we use.

Kierkegaard explains the concept of big meaning with his quote:

The thing is to find a truth which is true for me, to find the idea for which I can live and die.

Big meaning, therefore, differs from cosmic meaning in the sense that it is 100% subjective.

Small meaning is experiential meaning (one of Wong’s 3 modalities of meaning). Seeing your daughter smile, meaning, experienced at the moment.


Personally, I do not agree with Frankl that every moment contains meaning. I think every moment has the potential to be a meaningful moment if you let yourself experience it. The thing to watch out for is to not always look for meaning or feel pressured to experience it. One could start to feel stupid for not finding the meaning that is supposedly there, especially during dark times.


Suchness Meaning

Maslow would have agreed with the concept of meaning-making.

He even came up with a term for this phenomenon, ‘suchness meaning,’ and beautifully described it as follows:

What is the meaning of a leaf, a fugue, a sunset, a flower, a person? They “mean” themselves, explain themselves, and prove themselves. You can’t make sense of many basic experiences in life. “You can’t be rational about them; they just are. About all you can do with them is simply to recognize their existence, to accept them, and, whenever possible, to enjoy them in their richness and mystery, at the same time realising that they constitute much of the answer to the question ‘What is the meaning of life?’

Well, there’s your tweet quote right there. If only it had 140 characters…

Somewhat more spiritually, Osho described the same suchness by saying:

In search for the meaning of life, look for life. Once you find life you will discover its meaning.

What thoughts or actions these quotes stir for you? I would love to hear them in our comments section.


Global and Situational Meaning

In response to my LinkedIn article Why ‘What is the Meaning of Life? is a Silly Question, my friend David Penglase remarked:

The key difference I think is in the important but subtle difference between “meaning of” and “meaning in.” The “meaning of” my life suggests a summarization. Whereas, “meaning in” opens the possibility to why and how the various life roles we have can provide us with meaning.

This is the same distinction that Frankl made with global verse situational meaning, “meaning of” referring to the global meaning and “meaning in” to situational meaning.

What we can learn from Dave’s remark and from Frankl’s distinction is that the ‘meaning of meaning’ changes depending on both its context and the perspective we take.

That is one reason, to me, that it seems absurd to consider ‘meaning’ as a word complete in itself with one answer.


Global Meaning

Global or ultimate meaning (aka ‘The Ultimate Meaning Hypothesis’) relates the intrinsic meaning of life.

I do not believe that life has intrinsic value. Instead, I believe life to be intrinsically absurd—because of its suchness. That absurdity, along with everything else that can be said about life, is mere attribution.

Let’s make sure we don’t turn our death-denying illusions into life-denying illusions.

According to Wong, the advantage of the belief in the intrinsic value of life is that is more functional than alternative global beliefs by facilitating the discovery of the meaning of the moment.

That, to me, is committing philosophical suicide. It is taking the Matrix’ blue pill.

taking the red or blue pill
Matrix Reference: Red Pill or Blue Pill? Image Retrieved by URL

Cypher: You know, I know this steak doesn’t exist. I know that when I put it in my mouth, the Matrix is telling my brain that it is juicy and delicious. After nine years, you know what I realize?

*Takes a bite of his steak*

Cypher: Ignorance is bliss.

One of the points that the Matrix makes, similar to Nozick’s experience machine thought-experiment, is that humans prefer life to be ‘real’ rather than to experience the greatest form of pleasure ad infinitum.

They would rather be, in the words of John Stuart Mill, a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied.

I choose not to subscribe to the notion that life has intrinsic value, even if it has proven to be functional, even if it can serve as a lubricant between daily life and the meaning I experience throughout it.


Situational Meaning

What Frankl meant with ‘situational meaning’ is the same as the concept of ‘small meaning’ explained earlier. Meaning that can be experienced from moment to moment in daily life.


Living Meaning, Personal Meaning, and Life Activity

Living meaning is 100% objective and relates to personal meaning. However, they are not the same.

For it’s not the things that feed his spirit, but rather the links between the things. Not the diamond, but some relations between people and the diamond may feed him. Not the sand, but some relations established between the sand and the tribes. Not the words in a book, but some relations existing in the book between and beyond words, relations that are love, poem and Lord’s wisdom.

– A. de Saint-Exupery

This quote reminds us of the central tenet of cognitive-behavioral theory, namely that there is:

  • a given situation
  • your interpretation of that situation
  • your resulting thoughts, feelings, and actions

The situation does not directly influence your feelings and or actions; your interpretation of the situation does. Have you ever had bad food service while ordering coffee? If you interpret that situation with a thought like, “That server must be having a rough day, and their behavior has nothing to do with me,” then you might shake the situation quickly and move along with your day.

However, given the same situation, if you interpret that situation with thoughts like, “That server must hate me, I guess I should not come to my favorite cafe anymore,” then you are likely going to leave with a heavy heart (and no coffee).

It may be a silly example, but it conveys how our interpretations affect us, and more than the events themselves.

The same goes for meaning. Meaning is about your relationship with a subject or phenomenon, and not about the thing itself.


Living Meaning

Living meaning describes the relationship between objects, phenomena, happenings, and actions that are a part of one’s life. It contains the same suchness aspect as described before because it does not depend on being understood. It simply is.

This is a metaphysical rather than a psychological relationship between the individual and the things in their life.

Example: The chair in my room has meaning to the extent that it influences my life by its being because it is there.


Personal Meaning

Personal meaning is the form in which the subject knows and sees his living meanings, i.e. his interpretation of the situation.

This is Leontiev:

“The consciousness merely marks out and emphasizes what is significant for the subject, and sets before him the “task for meaning,” that of becoming aware of the concrete place that the corresponding objects or events occupy in his life, of the motives, needs, and values of the subject with which they are connected, and of the precise nature of the connection. The answer to this question, the resolution of this task requires the special inner activity of meaning-creation.”

In other words, what is significant for you about an object or situation will shape how you interpret meaning in certain events.


Life Activity

This personal meaning translates to meaning-based structures of the personality, which in their turn translate to a system that facilitates the regulation of the subject’s life-activity in accordance with a specific meaning-based logic.

Basically, the individual’s beliefs about meaning regulate their actions and over time, their life activity.

Leontiev concludes that bearing in mind these three planes of the existence of meaning, we can define meaning as the relation between the subject.


Meaning as a Relationship

The resulting meaning is partly objective (living meaning) and partly subjective (personal meaning).

Thereby, it is more non-dual in nature than the other forms of meaning we have discussed.

Life’s relevance, significance or value are not of primary concern on a quest for its meaning. Rather, let us look at the relationship between an object and the subject.

One final example:

  1. Your daughter smiles. (fact, situation, living meaning, objective, suchness meaning)
  2. You see your daughter’s smile and interpret this as meaningful. (small meaning, situational meaning, personal meaning, interpretation of the situation)
  3. You return your daughter’s smile and experience a meaningful moment. (life activity, behavior)


  1. Phenomenon in the life of an individual
  2. Goes through the (subjective) lens of the individual
  3. Result in a feeling or action dependant upon the personality structure of the individual that regulates behavior


Summing up

Meaning is the relationship between a phenomenon and a subject. It varies in scope and depends on context, personality, and beliefs and is subjective in nature.

Do you agree? Whether you do or do not, I would love to hear your thoughts in our comments section posted after the Recommended Reading.


Recommended Reading

Over the years, the subject of meaning has become a true passion of mine. If you are also interested in this subject, I highly recommend you order a copy of the following books:

  • Existential Psychotherapy by Irvin Yalom (and all other books by Irvin Yalom for that matter, but especially this one)
  • Meaning in Positive and Existential Psychology (brilliant collection of articles by Springer)
  • The Denial of Death by Ernest Becker (Becker’s best work, awarded with the Pulitzer price)
  • Man’s Search for Meaning by Victor Frankl (currently very trending and often cited in the field of PP)
  • Zona: A Book About a Film About a Journey to a Room by Geoff Dyer (a book about Tarkovski’s 1979 movie ‘Stalker’)
  • Meanings of Life by Roy Baumeister (diving into empirical studies)

Besides books, check out these articles written by Baumeister, Wong, Leontiev, Emmons and Mike Steger.

What I have found is that in asking the question ‘What is the meaning of life?’ and in finding possible answers to it, therein lies my primary sense of meaning.

  • Batthyany, A. & Russo-Netzer, P., 2014, Meaning in Existential and Positive Psychology, Chapter 1: Psychologies of Meaning
  • Frankl, V., 1946, Man’s Search for Meaning
  • Stephen Downes (Jan 09, 2009). Types of meaning. Retrieved from http://halfanhour.blogspot.com.es/2009/01/types-of-meaning.html
  • Leontiev, D.A., Three Facets of Meaning, Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, vol. 43, no. 6, November–December 2005, pp. 45–72.
  • Leontiev, D.A., The Phenomenon of Meaning: How Psychology Can Make Sense of It
  • Maslow, A., 1966, The Psychology of Science
  • Wong, Paul T.P., Wong L., McDonald, M.J., Klaassen, D.K., The Positive Psychology of Meaning and Spirituality. Abbotsford, BC: INPM Press, 2007. P. 33-44.
  • Wong, Paul T.P., Victor Frankl’s Meaning Seeking Model and Positive Psychology, Retrieved from http://www.drpaulwong.com/viktor-frankls-meaning-seeking-model-and-positive-psychology/
  • Yalom, Irvin D., 1980, Existential Psychotherapy

About the Author

Seph Fontane Pennock, BBA, is the co-founder of PositivePsychology.com. Seph strongly believes that we can deal with most of life’s absurdities by leveraging human connection and challenging ourselves, instead of using dogma or pharmaceutical drugs.


  1. mesut cenan konal

    what is exactly meant by “Life’s relevance, significance or value are not of primary concern on a quest for its meaning.”

    paraphrase? and extend upon please.

    • Nicole Celestine

      Hi Mesut,

      I think what Seph’s saying here is that when we consider meaning from the ‘Living Meaning, Personal Meaning, and Life Activity’ perspective, questions about the higher-level, grand purpose of life become irrelevant. Instead, the focus becomes about how the objective features of our everyday reality result in particular interpretations that we perceive as meaningful, resulting in subsequent behaviors (see the example about the smiling daughter).

      Hope this helps!

      – Nicole | Community Manager

  2. Santosh Sali

    I was searching on “meaning” and stumbled on the post. Seems term “meaning” and “meaningfulness” as used in organization behavior seems different than discussed here.

    But I really liked the references given at the end for further reading. Thanks.

  3. Sami

    Not a 100% sure why I’m bothering to type this, as it is an inherently meaningless activity to try to change anyone’s mind on the internet. I mostly was looking to see if someone had a definition of “meaningfulness” that wasn’t self-referential. Haven’t found one yet, but that’s primitives for ya, some ideas just are what they are. I appreciate what you’re trying to do here, providing resources and alternate sources of meaning for folks who didn’t find the usual ways satisfying, but the side notes are, at their best, misunderstandings of the average person’s conception of meaning. At worst they are an arrogant attitude and a dismissal of the beliefs of others as self-delusions. Believe it or not, many fundamentalist Christians accuse atheists of being “blue pill takers” who lie to themselves so they can avoid God or something. I don’t find it particularly convincing or generous an opinion when they make it, and it doesn’t really come off any better when atheists do the same thing. Some people, whether through rationally thought out beliefs or gut feelings, genuinely find the world meaningful for reasons that are compelling, and would find the assertion that life is “absurd” or “cruel” to be strange or immature.

    Take Camus, for all his talk of life’s absurdity he still is incredibly attached to it, going so far as to say that sysiphus should be happy to be pushing his boulder up the hill, if only for another moment of life. The thing is, when you deny that life has meaning the question becomes “what do you think life doesn’t have”? Is meaning like a color? Is it an extra quality besides love, beauty, and happiness? Because if it’s none of those things than life seems ok without it. Who cares if the universe is very big and old and we are small flames, why would that deter us from living our lives? Why would a story having an ending make it a worse story? At the end of the day it seems that life is gift for most of us.

    When you consider that life is wanted by nearly anyone, and is a fantastic gift owed to nobody, given at the expense of at the very least your parents and probably many others before them, then the idea of a “cosmic plan” doesn’t seem so bad. What a terrible “sadist” God must be to allow us the chance to laugh and love one another. Even if this were the end of the road, is it not a beautiful road? I wouldn’t accuse the road of being perfect, but I wouldn’t trade it for no road.

    As for a cosmic plan, spiritual folks aren’t satisfied that there is merely “thought” behind the death and suffering of the world. They have hope that thought is a worthy one. When a teacher saves the lives of a few students by holding back a mindless shooter, forfeiting his life in the process, his death is slightly lighter to them because it happened for the sake of others. It was meaningful, in as much as the students whose future he saved were meaningful. That is the kind of “plan” we hope for. One where everything was necessary for a greater good. It might not be a thing, but many people, myself included find life itself to be meaningful in and of itself, so why shouldn’t that quality extend to a greater scale? And if that meaning is sometimes hard to see, so what? Why should a child understand all the grand purposes of their parent? The funny thing about being open to that type of thinking is that once you get used to it, it’s kinda hard to see it another way. I imagine that it must be the same for your way of thinking as well, and so I respect that I could be wrong, though I obviously don’t think I am, and that you probably arrived at your beliefs through the same kind of introspection I do, and that regardless you try to do a good thing.

    I learned a bit from OCD that faith isn’t a delusion, but a choice to trust the things you know you should trust. At the end of the day, nothing is certain, we could all be brains in vats after all, but we are forced to choose different kinds of meaning, to take bets on what might be true. The faithful choose a meaning that’s slightly harder to hold in your hand, but that doesn’t make it a delusion. It is simply the courage to reach out for the stars, sometimes ignoring the candles and the streetlights that are closer by. I’m sure it’s similar to the courage you exhibit when you choose to act kindly in a world you believe is absurd. I think it’s nice what you do here. Maybe don’t be so arrogant about dismissing others beliefs as self delusion or fairytales or whatever other number of offhand insults your probably used to.

    • JOHN

      Wow! that is profound.

    • Martin Joseph Lowe

      Well…surely what is here is an opinion summarising opinions, of summarised opinions…therefore…in the long comments..you assign a meaning…your own feelings and opinions on the opinions…if I built buildings on such notions, they would surely fall in the quick sand…
      Stephen Hawking was asked before he died did he believe in God, and he said we are in average monkey on an average planet – they, monkeys or animals, or beings, that we are, don’t hold such high opinions and high notions and we are arrogant in ourselves, all of us, for believing that there is much more than to live life in the best possible way and in the most unique way, the same as every other living being on the planet does-it is in your own notions there is arrogance for believing them to be the truth, they are only yours, as are mine, but then, I am not destructively searching, labelling, nor trying to define meaning…

    • Ricardo

      Sami, that was very intriguing indeed, thank you for taking the time to write this. Just wondering, from your perspective on “meaning “what do you think “eaning of work” entails? Not asking about meaning in work or meaningful work here.

      I really hope to hear back from you.

    • Ricardo Mahshi

      What’s your take on the meaning of work?

  4. Shane E Lucas


    What if someone developed a Law of Meaning?

  5. Joaquin Andrade

    I’m an MD specialized in neuro immuno endocrinology. The meaning of life issue is increasingly seen in many patients with very different physical disorders. I realyy enjoyed and learned of, the article. Congrats to thr authors.

  6. Yan Yan

    This article does not truly address the question……. First of all, what is “meaning”? Please note that, (1) there are things that are abstract but objective, e.g. 3+4=7, mathematics, logic,…. these are abstract but objective. Objective as they reflect the reality/are a part of the reality. (2) there are things that are abstract but not objective, e.g. beauty, love/disgust. These are some psychological/mental judgement of an individual. I believe “meaning” should be the (2) type of thing. So if we want to talk about “meaning of life”, what we should do is to find out the “cognitive conditions” that cause the feeling/cognition of “meaningful”, i.e. he finds that this event meaningful because of these cognitive conditions……
    Now when you see your daughter smiles and feeling it to be meaningful, I guess the hidden conditions behind are: you love your daughter, your daughter is a “good thing”, smiling is a “good thing”, ……. (must have more conditions but now I don’t know).
    I have been looking for the “cognitive conditions” that cause the feeling/cognition of “meaningful”. Still have to look for the answer.

    • Tom

      It seems to me that cognition, or cognitive conditions, are also not at the root of understanding meaning, although it would be interesting to read how cognitive conditions help explain our thirst for meaning. I guess it has to do with humankind’s immense capacity to imagine – to the extreme of delusionalism.

      Mother Nature’s prime directive, embedded in our genes, demands survival and perpetuation, etc. Meaning then, perhaps, arises the stronger live’s events align well with these imperatives.

      • Ricardo

        Hi Tom,
        Can you elaborate more on the point you raised about going beyond cognitive conditions? Pls don’t hold back 🙂


  7. Dan

    Is the Living Meaning, Personal Meaning & Life Activity breakdown your own model Seph?

  8. Nyuiemedi

    This piece on meaning of meaning is mind blowing. when one considers how often we experience meaninglessness in our daily life and feel that life is awful and not worth living, then there is a crucial need for further study into the concept of meaning and developing some theoretical proposition to establish this area. Existentialism does provide some basis though, and so is positive psychology.
    I am very much interested in developing more insight into this. thanks for the marvelous work.

Load More Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *