What Is the Emotion Wheel? Understanding Plutchik’s Model
First, let’s talk about emotions.
Emotion researchers describe them as “episodes” involving changes in five internal subsystems in response to internal or external stimuli (Scarantino, 2015).
Below is a table from the International Handbook of Emotions in Education showing the relationship between the various factors and subsystems, as well as their presumed functions (Shuman & Scherer, 2014).
| Component |
Primary function |
Examples |
| Subjective feeling |
Monitoring |
Sadness, happiness, gratitude, anger, feeling good |
| Action tendency |
Motivation |
Urge to weep, to jump up and down, to approach |
| Appraisal |
Meaning making |
I just lost something; I just received a gift; I passed a difficult test; something good happened to me |
| Motor activity |
Communication |
Crying, smiling, raising one’s chin, making oneself small, moving one’s arms up and down quickly |
| Physiological |
Support |
Changes in pulse, blood flow, brain activity |
Emotions influence our actions through five components.
1. Subjective feeling
This is where we simply experience the feelings. An emotion is felt by monitoring the internal universe and recognizing what is being experienced at that time.
2. Action tendency
Once the emotion is identified, the body prepares for action. Emotions facilitate certain actions rather than others, meaning that while some are normally unconscious, like jerking a hand away from a hot iron, others are within our control.
3. Appraisal
By analyzing the emotion, we can identify the situations, actions, environments, or individuals that are causing it. This helps us to track how these stimuli impact our wellbeing. It is also necessary for informing the next component.
4. Motor activity
This is the communicative function of expressing what we are experiencing through means like facial expressions, hand gestures, body movements, and more.
5. Physiological
This component supports all others and is the chemical reaction that our body experiences. For instance, the rush of blood to the face occurs when we experience anger.
While the components of the emotions we feel are present in all individuals, the intensity and expression of these emotions differ from one person to another. There are also social factors like gender, culture, and race that explain why people may feel emotions differently despite experiencing similar situations.
For example, hearing words like, “I am afraid,” “I feel jittery,” “I don’t want to be here,” or “I just don’t have enough time to prepare for the final” are all different components of a similar emotion (Shuman & Scherer, 2014).
“I am afraid” belongs to the subjective feeling component; it describes the feeling of fear.
“I feel jittery” belongs to the physiological component, referring to the way the body feels.
“I just don’t have enough time to prepare for the final” belongs to the appraisal component, as it includes a cognitive appraisal of the situation and what is causing the emotion.
“I don’t want to be here” fits into the motor activity component, referring to an action that may or may not be carried out in response to the emotion.
Based on his many years of studying emotions, psychologist Robert Plutchik (1991) proposed that there are eight primary emotions that serve as the foundation for all others: joy, sadness, acceptance, disgust, fear, anger, surprise, and anticipation.
The eight primary emotions that he identified are grouped below as polar opposites:
- Joy vs. sadness
- Acceptance vs. disgust
- Fear vs. anger
- Surprise vs. anticipation
The foundation of his emotions theory stems from the following 10 postulates (Changing Minds, 2016):
- Animals and humans
The midbrain, or limbic system, of a human is similar to that of other mammals. Animals and humans experience the same basic emotions.
- Evolutionary history
Emotions came into being as part of the evolutionary process, long before there were apes or humans.
- Survival issues
The most influential role of emotions is to help us survive.
- Prototype patterns
These are the common identifiable patterns and elements that make up each emotion.
- Basic emotions
The most basic emotions are the primary ones: trust, fear, surprise, sadness, disgust, anger, anticipation, and joy.
- Combinations
Adding up these various primary emotions will produce new ones such as love = (joy + trust), guilt = (joy + fear), and delight = (joy + surprise).
- Hypothetical constructs
Emotions are constructs, or ideas, that help describe a certain experience.
- Opposites
Like many things in nature, there is a duality with emotions; hence, each one has its polar opposite:
- Sadness is the opposite of joy
- Trust is the opposite of disgust
- Fear is the opposite of anger
- Surprise is the opposite of anticipation
- Similarity
The degree of similarity determines which emotions are more closely related and which are complete opposites.
- Intensity
This degree of change in intensity, from weak to strong, produces the diverse number of emotions we can feel. The emotions range in intensity as follows:
- Trust: acceptance to admiration
- Fear: timidity to terror
- Surprise: uncertainty to amazement
- Sadness: gloominess to grief
- Disgust: dislike to loathing
- Anger: annoyance to fury
- Anticipation: interest to vigilance
- Joy: serenity to ecstasy
What our readers think
Let’s look at emotions more as dynamical motivations, as useful adaptations, for significant situational behavioral changes. Remember, though, ALWAYS dynamical, always changing and moving toward situational responses.
In this way, we do not become “hung up” on ideas of stasis. NOTHING in us, or in any organism, OR in the universe is static.
Rather than imagine human emotional sharing as “contagious”, recognize social interaction as “testing” by other individuals, leading to an optimality of possible responses. We evolved to be interdependent, more so than less obligate social animals, and so the draw of pleasure and recognition of power to adapt better and sooner, due to the varying different memories, associations, and evaluations that members, others, can ADD to more correctly respond.
After all, emotions always arise through some surprising sensory (as well as motor and sensorimotor) cognition. We balance; we orient our whole self – this is the brain’s JOB One!
Start here, now, with the recognition that constant change is occurring, and that we, as animals, as beings with quick capacity to evaluate and most of all, respond, initiate Change, however overtly or subtly, however appropriately instantly or gradually.
Then, you gain a recognition of the mobility and power YOU have, your AGENCY.
(and consequently you ARE able to shed the negatively valenced illusions with which you may formerly have immobilized yourself.
Remember that immobility is NOT useful over time or situation.
Were it so, you would not have your mercurial, lightning brain,
You would never have developed either neurons, muscle, the ability to monitor and move.
You are made for motion!)
Hi, Michael!
What an insightful perspective. Viewing emotions as dynamic, adaptive responses rather than static states is empowering and aligns with our nature as beings made for change and movement. I love how you highlight agency—our ability to adapt, respond, and shed limiting illusions. This is such a powerful way to reframe emotional challenges and embrace our natural capacity for growth.
Warm regards,
Julia | Community Manager
I am interested in how to find safety in navigating emotions. I don’t really see much on that concept – safety – except as a response to a threat. Any ideas where I could go?
Hi Cindy,
Here is an article on psychological safety: https://positivepsychology.com/psychological-safety/.
Let me know if this article answers your questions – and feel free to ask any more questions coming up. 🙂
Warmly,
Julia | Community Manager
Amazing synchronicity, Cindy: am finalising a workshop on Emotional Intelligence I’m giving tomorrow to Polish young leaders … love this article and just saw your comment! Blessings to you, Bene
When Jung suddenly recognized a synchronicity, he was aware of entrainment, a basic property of the physical universe. We, and all things at every scale, entrain to some extent.
You express this, bringing it to prominence to both yourself and others,through surprise.
nice jobs thx
Great content. Weird that you do not mention Russell’s Circumplex model as the inspiration and basis of Plutchik’s emotion wheel?
I liked the links to academic papers, it approved me that this text is scientific, and at the same time showed me many connections to other concepts. However I would like to make more connections between Paul Aikman’s feelings wheel and MBTI. I wonder if there are any scientific papers showing a relation between “understanding the world”-“taking decisions” in MBTI and wheel of feelings.
Thank you very much. Calmed me down the moment I started to read this.
A key component seems to be the addition of high activation (characteristic of rage). This makes hatred different from loathing as you can loathe something without it being a physiologically activating experience.
We have a nine-year-old with big feelings, which has prompted us to explore how to navigate feelings more intentionally. We homeschool, and are using aspects of this article to help all three of our children in better understanding of themselves (and us parents as well). Making our own illustration of the chart for the wall! Thank you for sharing this life-changing stuff!
Just curious. What ever happened to HATRED? Hatred is a very angry emotional response towards certain people or ideas, usually related to disliking something. Hatred is often associated with intense feelings of anger, contempt, and disgust. Hatred is sometimes seen as the opposite of love. For such a commonly identified emotion, I do not see it in any of these charts.
Hi Dr. Cavanaugh,
That’s a great question! I’m not an emotions researcher, so I can’t give you a definitive answer. But my sense is that hatred lies somewhere between loathing and rage. A key component seems to be the addition of high activation (characteristic of rage). This makes hatred different from loathing as you can loathe something without it being a physiologically activating experience. Like I can loathe brussels sprouts without getting fired up at the thought of them.
This would be my best guess 🙂
– Nicole | Community Manager
Lovely read…helped me design a food menu