Master Resilience Training (MRT) in the US Army: PowerPoint & Interview

Master Resilience TrainingMaster Resilience Training (MRT) is a resilience-training program that is offered by the United States Army.

The goal of the program is to teach officers about resilience and to train those officers to teach other soldiers about resilience as well. It is a joint effort between the Positive Psychology Center at the University of Pennsylvania and the United States Army.

Read on to learn about what MRT is and whether or not it has found success in its short time as an army offering. This piece also includes PowerPoint presentations which can help clarify MRT for more visual learners.

Before you read on, we thought you might like to download our 3 Resilience Exercises for free. These engaging, science-based exercises will help you to effectively deal with difficult circumstances and give you the tools to improve the resilience of your clients, students or employees.

What is MRT?

Master Resilience Training (MRT) is “a 10-day program of study that teaches resilience skills to noncommissioned officers” which has been offered in the United States Army since 2009 (Reivich et al., 2011). MRT is an aspect of the United States Army’s broader Comprehensive Soldier Fitness program (Seligman et al., 2011). The program consists of three different components:

  1. preparation
  2. sustainment
  3. enhancement

MRT was developed as a joint undertaking between the Positive Psychology Center at the University of Pennsylvania (which developed the preparation component), the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (which developed the sustainment component) and the United States Military Academy at West Point (which developed the enhancement component).

An important goal of the program is to teach these officers how to teach the program’s skills to other soldiers. This is because the army believes that MRT is the:

“backbone of a cultural transformation of the U.S. Army in which a psychologically fit army will have equal standing with a physically fit army”

(Reivich et al., 2011).

MRT is partially based on the University of Pennsylvania’s Penn Resilience Program (PRP), developed in the 1990s as an attempt to help prevent depression. In the first two years of its existence, the MRT program was taught to over 2,000 noncommissioned U.S. Army officers at the University of Pennsylvania (Cornum et al., 2011).

Master Resilience Training in the US Army

mrt master resilience training us army MRT was developed for and in conjunction with the United States Army and is used to help soldiers be more resilient on and off the field of battle.

While PRP was initially developed to help prevent depression, MRT is especially focused on post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

Specifically, the army was interested in fostering a proactive approach to PTSD, rather than simply waiting for soldiers to come home with PTSD and then beginning to treat it. The US Army is also interested in teaching MRT skills to families of soldiers as well as non-combat members of the army.

A study conducted after the MRT program had been offered to soldiers for four years examined the success of the program (Griffith et al., 2013). Over 90% of participants found the program to be “very helpful or helpful”, with the second module being rated as the most helpful and the third module is rated as the least helpful, although over 60% of participants still found the third module to be helpful [see below for more information on the modules].

Most interestingly, over 95% of participants said they found themselves using skills they learned in MRT both on the job and in their personal lives.

These findings indicate that MRT has been a resounding success in the short time it has been offered, as soldiers have overwhelmingly found it helpful. Even the third module, which was rated as the least helpful module of the seven, was still considered helpful for well over half of the participants.

The fact that soldiers have found MRT’s teachings to be valuable in both their work and personal lives shows the usefulness of the program and indicates that it could easily be adapted for general use outside of the army.

7 Modules of the Trainer Course

The preparation component of MRT consists of fives separate modules, while the sustainment and enhancement components each consist of their own modules. This means that the entire MRT program consists of seven different modules taught over the course of ten days. These modules, in the order that they are taught, are:

  1. Resilience (Two and a half days)
  2. Building Mental Toughness (Two and a half days)
  3. Identifying Character Strengths (One day)
  4. Strengthening Relationships (One day)
  5. Concluding Preparation Module (Half a day)
  6. Sustainment Module (One day)
  7. Enhancement Module (One day)

The first five modules which make up the preparation component are clearly influenced by positive psychology, which is unsurprising considering they were mostly developed by the University of Pennsylvania’s Positive Psychology Center.

  • The first module covers a number of topics, from what resilience is to which mental factors contribute to resilience (including self-awareness and optimism).
  • The second module focuses on how to cultivate these mental factors that contribute to resilience, by promoting problem solving and gratitude, among other things.
  • The third module focuses on identifying character strengths in oneself and in others.
  • and the fourth module focuses on strengthening relationships between soldiers and other soldiers, as well as between soldiers and the other people in their lives, such as family members.
  • The fifth module revisits the first four modules and also focuses on training soldiers to teach other soldiers these resilience skills.
  • The sixth module (the first one that is not a part of the preparation component) focuses on “reinforcing resilience skills over the course of a military career and applying these skills in the military-specific context” (Reivich et al., 2011). This module was mostly developed by the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research.
  • The seventh and final module, mostly developed by the Army Center for Enhanced Performance and heavily based on sports psychology, “presents an overview of the key skills taught by sports psychologists. The skills introduced are mental skills foundations, building confidence, goal setting, attention control, energy management, and imagery” (Reivich et al., 2011).

Interestingly, only one of these seven modules, the sixth one, is solely applicable to a military setting. The rest are geared towards soldiers but can easily be adapted for a general audience. This is expected, as five of the modules were developed by the Positive Psychology Center at the University of Pennsylvania while only two were developed by the army, but it shows the potential for MRT in a non-army setting.

One could imagine managers in a workplace learning about MRT and then passing on the skills to their employees, as well as a similar thing happening in schools.

A Handy PowerPoint Presentation

PowerPoint MRT U.S. Army

This PowerPoint presentation comes right here from your friends at

The presentation is an overview of what the MRT course looks like, including an overview of each module and what it consists of. It covers the entirety of the MRT program.

Click here to access this PowerPoint.

An Interview With An Experienced MRT Trainer

Chaplain (Captain) Mike MacKrellIn this article, we discussed the United States Army’s Master Resilience Training (MRT) program, which teaches noncommissioned officers some key resilience lessons so that they can go on and share these lessons with other soldiers.

While we worked hard to provide a useful description of MRT, there is no replacement for a description from someone who has actually gone through the program.

Fortunately, we have since been in touch with an MRT trainer who has taught the program for years, and who was generous enough to share his experiences with us in this interview.

Chaplain (Captain) Mike MacKrell is not only an expert in MRT but truly enjoys sharing its lessons with his fellow soldiers in the army.

He kindly took some time out of his busy schedule to give us an insight into the inner workings of the program, which he has taught to soldiers and civilians alike. If you want to learn about MRT, this is an excellent place to continue your education.

For clarity’s sake, the questions we sent to Chaplain (Captain) MacKrell have been bolded and numbered. His answers are directly under the corresponding questions, and a quick wrap-up written by us (and not him) follows the questions.

Please enjoy this interview about MRT with one of its proponents, and we can only hope that you learn as much from reading this interview as we did by conducting it.

1. How did you become an MRT trainer?

“I was on active duty standing up a resilience team to serve our soldier and family population where I was stationed and needed to get an overview and understanding of the program. I enrolled in the class and I am an ardent follower from the start.”

2. What aspect of MRT has stuck with you the most?

“Because of my love for soldiers and everything that has to do with psychology, I was ‘all-in’ from the start. The material has affected my life in so many good ways. The material provides basic working models that apply to situations and contexts we all find ourselves in. It is not a cure-all, but a framework for approaching life.”

3. What was the easiest part of MRT to teach?

“One of the first modules I learned was ‘Hunt the Good Stuff.’ A module designed to augment optimism and fight the negativity bias we all possess. I had just received a life-altering email and because of the place I was in, the material saved me from self-loathing and catastrophizing. No joke. The planets aligned for me that day.”

4. What was the hardest?

“The most difficult module, for me initially, was entitled ‘Problem Solving.’ Due to the emotional and relational nature of the news I received, I was transferring so much of me into the training and thus became unable to objectivize the problem sufficiently to really listen and face my circumstances. Now, eight years later, I can share what I have learned and do a much better job at teaching that portion of the training. The practice has made me a better learner and teacher.”

5. How well do MRT’s teachings translate to civilians?

“Very well I believe, if your view of life, like mine, is broader than just wearing a military uniform. Because I entered the military later in life, my experiences are mostly on the civilian side. I have heard and concur with many MRT’s that seeing the material’s utility in a broader sense is a more useful approach than just applying it to the rhythms of military service.”

6. Are there any difficulties in teaching it to civilians compared to soldiers (or vice-versa)?

“Depends on your mindset and sensitivity to life outside the military. If a trainer is reluctant or resistant to get to know their audience (which may be both civilian and military) I think they limit their ability to instruct, persuade and apply life lessons that are easily understood by all.”

7. How is MRT unique compared to other things soldiers are taught in the army?

“Other than curriculum used in the Army’s ‘Strong Bonds’ program (marriage enrichment and single soldier and family material) it is one of the better programs of instruction the army has ever had. Obviously, I am biased.”

8. In what ways have you found it easier to teach MRT as you have gathered more experience doing so?

“After practicing this for eight years, I can now share both success and failure stories with participants from my own desire to apply what I have learned in my life and significant relationships.”

9. Is there any advice you would give somebody teaching MRT for the first time?

“Do your homework long before your first class. Read more than just the footnotes. Get with other MRT’s and get their help and insights. Soldiers are quickly turned off by slide clickers- trainers who merely read the slide and don’t have a conversational experience using the material. This helps no one. Approach your audience as co-learners. Refuse to pontificate. Be vulnerable with your audience and learn from them as well.”

10. What was your experience learning about MRT for the first time?

“It was wonderfully incredible. I guess I was in the right frame of mind and came to the table at the right time.”

11. Is there anything else you would like to share about MRT itself or your experiences teaching MRT?

“It has been my privilege to familiarize and train this curriculum with soldiers and civilians in the Middle East on two deployments, in the Czech Republic two different times and on many civilian bases. Every time I am up to bat my preparation yields new insights. I have been the beneficiary far more than anyone I have spoken with. If a trainer is stoked and fired up about how it has made a difference in their life you can’t argue with the life change.”

Final Thoughts

Chaplain (Captain) Mike MacKrell has taught MRT to soldiers and civilians around the world and learns something new every time he teaches it. We hope this insight into an MRT trainer’s mind has helped you learn something new as well.

A Take-Home Message

While MRT is heavily geared towards soldiers and the families of soldiers, there are some lessons we can all take from the program. One of the main ideas behind MRT is to stop being purely reactive to issues such as PTSD and start taking steps to be more proactive. (Cornum et al., 2011).

This emphasis on being proactive is a cornerstone of positive psychology, as positive psychologists believe that everyone should know how to improve their lives, not just people whose lives need improving.

While it may not seem that MRT’s teachings apply to you, we could all benefit from learning about resilience and how to teach other people resilience skills. After all, the most valuable aspect of MRT is its focus on making sure people who complete an MRT program are able to pass on the program’s teachings to others.

If you learn about resilience and all of its benefits, you are not only helping yourself but are also helping anyone who you may pass your knowledge on to in the future.

We hope you enjoyed reading this article. Don’t forget to download our 3 Resilience Exercises for free.


  • Cornum, R., Matthews, M.D., Seligman, M.E.P. (2011). Comprehensive Soldier Fitness: Building resilience in a challenging institutional context. American Psychologist 66(1), 4-9.
  • Griffith, J., West, C. (2013). Master Resilience Training and Its Relationship to Individual Well-Being and Stress Buffering Among Army National Guard Soldiers. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 40(2), 140-155.
  • Reivich, K.J., Seligman, M.E.P., McBride, S. (2011). Master Resilience Training in the US Army. American Psychologist 66(1), 25-34.
  • Seligman, M.E.P. (2011). Building Resilience. Harvard Business Review 89(4), 100.


What our readers think

  1. Johanny Ortega

    I am wondering how does MRT differs from the Army’s current H2F program that has mindfulness and resiliency integrated.

    • Nicole Celestine, Ph.D.

      Hi Johanny,

      I believe the H2F program is newer (it was introduced in 2020) and it covers aspects of physical health, like sleep and nutrition in addition to those you mention. In contrast, the MRT centers around psychological aspects of resilience only, like self-regulation, optimism, etc.

      Hope this helps!

      – Nicole | Community Manager


    Hello, are there specific recent studies associated with the MRT program? I was an MRT from 2012-2015 at Ft Lewis/JBLM, and I am doing a paper on the efficacy of MRT long term. Are there any studies or papers for long-term findings?

    thank you

    • Nicole Celestine, Ph.D.

      Hi Bryan,

      I’d take a look at Lester et al. (2011) for a longitudinal study (15 months) addressing the efficacy of the program.

      Hope this helps!

      – Nicole | Community Manager

      • Alicia Cline, Suicide Prevention Program Mgr

        Dr. Celestine,
        Are you aware of any later studies? I’m also very interested to see if there are any significant differences in reported efficacy among the various Army components. Thanks so much for your work and passion on this very important subject matter !

        • Caroline Rou

          Hi Alicia,

          It seems that the longitudinal study from 2011 by Lester et al. is the most recent study that tests the impact of MRT specifically. However, if you are interested in the general role of resilience in soldiers during training, there is a recent longitudinal study by Sefidan et al. (2021) which investigates resilience as a protective factor during Basic Military Training. If I stumble across a more recent longitudinal study on MRT, I will post it in this thread.

          I hope this helps!

          – Caroline | Community Manager

  3. Donald


    Is your realizing resilience course based or similar to the MRT program? I’m ex-military and now a educator, so wanting to implement something similar to this in my training courses.



    • Nicole Celestine, Ph.D.

      Hi Don,

      Thanks for your interest. I’d say our Realizing Resilience Masterclass is a bit different from the MRT in a few ways. Here are some of the differences.

      – In its first module, MRT dives straight into the topic of resilience. In contrast, our course begins by framing resilience within the broader field of positive psychology, highlighting how it interrelates with other important phenomena like emotions, goals, and other people. This is done using the Sailboat Metaphor, which is useful metaphor you can use to talk about resilience in the context of internal and external life factors.

      – The third and fourth modules of MRT focus on character strengths and developing relationships, whereas we have separate courses that look at these in-depth (however, they are explored briefly in the discussion of the Sailboat Metaphor).

      – In addressing practical application, our course looks at attention (e.g., mindfulness), optimism, and coping strategies. These are presented in a way that is applicable to a general population. MRT seems to focus on how soldiers might use these skills in a military-specific context with a focus on high-performance (e.g., drawing on sports psychology).

      This is my sense of what the differences are! Let us know if you have more questions. I’ll be happy to help.

      – Nicole | Community Manager

  4. K. S. Paviyazhini

    As I am highly interested to explore and learn “Master Resilience Training”. Further, I would like to submit a project proposal related to ‘Resilience’, where this training will equip me to confidently execute the same.

    Hence, I request you to send a quotation mentioning the price (Positive Psychology Kit and MRT) so that I could get the expenses claimed from my institution.

    Anticipating your reply.

    • Nicole Celestine, Ph.D.

      Hi K.S.,

      To get a quote and learn more about the MRT training, please visit this website and perhaps get in touch via their contact form. As for the Positive Psychology Toolkit, this is one of our own resources, which is available for an annual subscription and contains over 400 tools. You can learn more about what’s included in the toolkit here.

      Let us know if you have any questions!

      – Nicole | Community Manager

      • John

        Hi Nicole,

        Were you one of the civilian trainers who taught MRT in the early stages to active duty soldiers? The reason I’m asking is because the training I received when inprocessing Fort Benning, GA in 2013 was phenomenal, and I would love to have someone basically give the same presentation and/or exercises to the company I work for. Any way I could make that happen?

  5. MT Evans

    This is very interesting and I just watched Jenzten Franklin’s sermon on this message. I wonder if the need to improve mental strength is a function of…an every one gets a trophy lifestyle, kids told they can be anything, the removal of church from school, and the “it’s me” social media culture of today.
    When I was in the military … We didn’t seem to have these issues.

    • Thea James

      No y’all just didn’t talk about them

  6. Mitch Page

    I am a doctoral student in social work at the University of Southern California.
    Are the outcome measures used to assess MRT efficacy based on self-report only or is there more objective data such as incidence and prevalence of PTSD and/or suicide among service members?
    Thank you.

    • Nicole Celestine

      Hi Mitch,
      Great question. I’ve had a quick look and it looks like the scholars behind the research did not capture indicators of mental illness (see here for an interesting critique of the program).
      Hope this helps.
      – Nicole | Community Manager

      • Isaac

        Please note that the critique of the program linked there is from a couple years before MRT existed… I do recall the CSF2 program that was in place at the time that article was written was ineffective and downright insulting to some of us Soldiers at times. When MRT came along it changed everything.

        • Nicole Celestine

          Hi Isaac,
          Ah, thank you for correcting me there! I had those two programs confused — it sounds like it’s good that the CSF2 program was dismantled. If you had any information to share about the MRT (or knew a good place to find it), I’m sure our readers would be very grateful. I’ll do some searching myself in the meantime.
          – Nicole | Community Manager

        • Mitch Page

          Issac, What changed? What is “everything?” Thanks, Mitch

        • Mitch Page

          Nicole, Thanks for your response. So the MRT program was not designed and implemented for the purpose of addressing service member PTSD or suicde?

          • Nicole Celestine

            Hi Mitch,
            After some searching, I’m afraid I’m still unsure. I’d suggest reaching out to the scholars involved in the project at UPenn to see if they can answer your question. You can do so here.
            – Nicole | Community Manager

    • Michael Sherman

      Mitch, reach out to me with your questions. I have been working for the program for the past 5 years. You are getting a lot of misinformation.

  7. Michael Sherman

    I have been a Performance and Resilience Expert for the Army for over 5 years. If you have questions, feel free to email me. Over 95% of those that take the course are soldiers. If you aren’t a soldier, you have to be affiliated with the Army and it must be part of your job to train MRT after you take the course. There are only so many seats per course at the installations and they will always go to soldiers first.
    If you are a civilian and have questions you can send them my way. You will not be able to take the course but there are other ways to get information using the same research.
    I don’t frequent this site often. Feel free to reach out –

  8. nigeria newspaper online

    Thanks for the post.Thanks Again. Great!.


Let us know your thoughts

Your email address will not be published.


Read other articles by their category

3 Resilience Exercises Pack