On the Meaning of Meaning: What Are We Really Looking For?

meaning definitions

If you have ever wondered about meaning, you are not alone in that quest for answers. 

“The question of meaning is not really one question but actually represents a cipher for a vast number of further questions. And it is by no means obvious whether these questions are answerable at all; neither do we know with any certainty into which area of expertise the responsibility for answering these questions falls.”

In response to this observation, I would like to propose that the field of positive psychology is, more than any other field, responsible for dealing with all matters related to meaning.

So far, it has already done a remarkable job; however, it is a gross understatement to claim that we are still in the early stages of our ‘will to meaning.’

Before trying to determine what an answer to this question might look like (such as 42), and even before coming up with a better question to ask, let us decide what ‘meaning’ means.

What are we really looking for?

 

 

On the Word ‘Meaning’

To dive into the concept of the meaning (of life), we have to deal with semantics first. That is, we have to make sure that we are on the same page.

First of all, the word ‘meaning’ in English is incredibly confusing. It simply means different things and those different things can mean different things as well. Confused yet? Good.

As Leontiev suggested, German and Russian are more convenient languages to use when we talk about meaning, because they have different words for different kinds of meaning.

(So does the Dutch language by the way). I’ll be a doll and stick to English for now.

So What do We Mean?

The meaning we are focused on when discussing the meaning of life is it’s ‘relevance, significance or value’. Thus, to avoid confusion, a clearer version of these questions is: “What is life’s relevance, significance or value?”

Later in this article, you will discover why that is not the right question either, but it suffices for now.

Philosophers, psychotherapists, and researchers have been dealing with this question for millennia and have identified different kinds of meaning.

Let’s take a look at some of them.

 

Terrestrial Meaning vs. Cosmic Meaning

In his book Existential Psychotherapy (1980), Yalom introduced cosmic and terrestrial meaning.

Cosmic meaning concerns itself with “whether life, in general, fits into some overall coherent pattern.” According to Yalom, cosmic meaning implies religious or spiritual connotations because it sees meaning as part of a grand scheme, or, a bigger picture superior to that of the individual.

Sidenote:

The paradoxical thing is that a grand design seems to offer people comfort. But don’t we have enough to suffer from our consciousness of the inevitability of our own impending death? Cosmic meaning suggests that if there was some sort of thought behind our messy human situation, maybe it would feel lighter. That, to me, is the definition of cruelty.

If there was such a thing as a grand design, the only meaning I would likely experience in a world like that would be from directly and passionately fighting its sadism.

I say that the ‘pattern’ we fit in is nature. Everything else is comforting make-belief. You are free to believe what you think. That’s the beauty of it. Leave a comment below this article if you feel like expressing your beliefs. I’d love to hear them.

Terrestrial meaning, on the other hand, offers an answer to the question: what is the meaning of my life?

In doing so, it whittles the question down to a more manageable size. Essentially, the debate of cosmic verse terrestrial meaning is the one of the ‘external world’ verse the ‘internal world.’

Do we believe that meaning is something imposed on us, or that we are free to create it ourselves? If we like the meaning we create and it guides us, is that enough?

 

‘The’ Meaning and ‘a’ Meaning

Leontiev differentiates between ‘the’ meaning and ‘a’ meaning.

‘The meaning’ is the single, ultimate integrative reference point inside the person. This type of meaning is similar to terrestrial meaning.

‘A meaning’ represents an element of ever-present mechanisms of the ongoing regulation of behavior and cognition. ‘A meaning’, therefore, is more concerned with affect regulation. It serves as a psychological panacea for successful living and as a tranquilizer against the existential uncertainty mentioned before.

Of course, it is purely subjective and tells us more about human psychology than about life itself.

Although it does not really help us in our quest for meaning, ‘a meaning’ teaches us the importance of placing the meaning of something into some intentional context.

That is exactly what I find so scary about absolute systems/grand designs: they (try to) give context to everything.

 

Big vs. Small Meaning

I find these terms more poetic in nature, which I appreciate. To me, life is boring when scientific lingo is all we use. 

Kierkegaard explains the concept of big meaning with his quote:

The thing is to find a truth which is true for me, to find the idea for which I can live and die.”

Big meaning, therefore, differs from cosmic meaning in the sense that it is 100% subjective.

Small meaning is experiential meaning (one of Wong’s 3 modalities of meaning). Seeing your daughter smile, meaning, experienced at the moment.

Sidenote:

Personally, I do not agree with Frankl that every moment contains meaning. I think every moment has the potential to be a meaningful moment if you let yourself experience it. The thing to watch out for is to not always look for meaning or feel pressured to experience it. One could start to feel stupid for not finding the meaning that is supposedly there, especially during dark times.

 

Suchness Meaning

Maslow would have agreed with the concept of meaning-making.

He even came up with a term for this phenomenon, ‘suchness meaning,’ and beautifully described it as follows:

“What is the meaning of a leaf, a fugue, a sunset, a flower, a person? They “mean” themselves, explain themselves, and prove themselves. You can’t make sense of many basic experiences in life. “You can’t be rational about them; they just are. About all you can do with them is simply to recognize their existence, to accept them, and, whenever possible, to enjoy them in their richness and mystery, at the same time realising that they constitute much of the answer to the question ‘What is the meaning of life?’”

Well, there’s your tweetquote right there. If only it had 140 characters…

Somewhat more spiritually, Osho described the same suchness by saying:

“In search for the meaning of life, look for life. Once you find life you will discover its meaning.”

What thoughts or actions these quotes stir for you? I would love to hear them in our comments section.

 

Global and Situational Meaning

In response to my LinkedIn article Why ‘What is the Meaning of Life? is a Silly Question, my friend David Penglase remarked:

“The key difference I think is in the important but subtle difference between “meaning of” and “meaning in.” The “meaning of” my life suggests a summarization. Whereas, “meaning in” opens the possibility to why and how the various life roles we have can provide us with meaning.”

This is the same distinction that Frankl made with global verse situational meaning, “meaning of” referring to the global meaning and “meaning in” to situational meaning.

What we can learn from Dave’s remark and from Frankl’s distinction is that the ‘meaning of meaning’ changes depending on both its context and the perspective we take.

That is one reason, to me, that it seems absurd to consider ‘meaning’ as a word complete in itself with one answer. 

Global Meaning

Global or ultimate meaning (aka ‘The Ultimate Meaning Hypothesis’) relates the intrinsic meaning of life.

Sidenote:
I do not believe that life has intrinsic value. Instead, I believe life to be intrinsically absurd—because of its suchness. That absurdity, along with everything else that can be said about life, is mere attribution.

Let’s make sure we don’t turn our death-denying illusions into life-denying illusions.

According to Wong, the advantage of the belief in the intrinsic value of life is that is more functional than alternative global beliefs by facilitating the discovery of the meaning of the moment.

That, to me, is committing philosophical suicide. It is taking the Matrix’ blue pill.

taking the red or blue pill
Matrix Reference: Red Pill or Blue Pill? Image Retrieved by URL

Cypher: You know, I know this steak doesn’t exist. I know that when I put it in my mouth, the Matrix is telling my brain that it is juicy and delicious. After nine years, you know what I realize?

*Takes a bite of his steak*

Cypher: Ignorance is bliss.

One of the points that the Matrix makes, similar to Nozick’s experience machine thought-experiment, is that humans prefer life to be ‘real’ rather than to experience the greatest form of pleasure ad infinitum.

They would rather be, in the words of John Stuart Mill, a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied.

I choose not to subscribe to the notion that life has intrinsic value, even if it has proven to be functional, even if it can serve as a lubricant between daily life and the meaning I experience throughout it.

Situational Meaning

What Frankl meant with ‘situational meaning’ is the same as the concept of ‘small meaning’ explained earlier. Meaning that can be experienced from moment to moment in daily life.

 

Living Meaning, Personal Meaning, and Life Activity

Living meaning is 100% objective and relates to personal meaning. However, they are not the same. 

“For it’s not the things that feed his spirit, but rather the links between the things. Not the diamond, but some relations between people and the diamond may feed him. Not the sand, but some relations established between the sand and the tribes. Not the words in a book, but some relations existing in the book between and beyond words, relations that are love, poem and Lord’s wisdom.”

– A. de Saint-Exupery

This quote reminds us of the central tenet of cognitive behavioral theory, namely that there is:

  • a given situation
  • your interpretation of that situation
  • your resulting thoughts, feelings, and actions

 

The situation does not directly influence your feelings and or actions; your interpretation of the situation does. Have you ever had bad food service while ordering coffee? If you interpret that situation with a thought like, “That server must be having a rough day, and their behavior has nothing to do with me,” then you might shake the situation quickly and move along with your day. 

However, given the same situation, if you interpret that situation with thoughts like, “That server must hate me, I guess I should not come to my favorite cafe anymore,” then you are likely going to leave with a heavy heart (and no coffee). 

It may be a silly example, but it conveys how our interpretations affect us, and more than the events themselves.

The same goes for meaning. Meaning is about your relationship with a subject or phenomenon, and not about the thing itself.

Living Meaning

Living meaning describes the relationship between objects, phenomena, happenings, and actions that are a part of one’s life. It contains the same suchness aspect as described before because it does not depend on being understood. It simply is.

This is a metaphysical rather than a psychological relationship between the individual and the things in their life.

Example: The chair in my room has meaning to the extent that it influences my life by its being because it is there.

Personal Meaning

Personal meaning is the form in which the subject knows and sees his living meanings, i.e. his interpretation of the situation.

This is Leontiev:

“The consciousness merely marks out and emphasizes what is significant for the subject, and sets before him the “task for meaning,” that of becoming aware of the concrete place that the corresponding objects or events occupy in his life, of the motives, needs, and values of the subject with which they are connected, and of the precise nature of the connection. The answer to this question, the resolution of this task requires the special inner activity of meaning-creation.”

 

In other words, what is significant for you about an object or situation will shape how you interpret meaning in certain events.

Life Activity

This personal meaning translates to meaning-based structures of the personality, which in their turn translate to a system that facilitates the regulation of the subject’s life-activity in accordance with a specific meaning-based logic.

Basically, the individual’s beliefs about meaning regulate their actions and over time, their life activity.

Leontiev concludes that bearing in mind these three planes of the existence of meaning, we can define meaning as the relation between the subject.

 

Meaning as a Relationship

The resulting meaning is partly objective (living meaning) and partly subjective (personal meaning).

Thereby, it is more non-dual in nature than the other forms of meaning we have discussed.

Life’s relevance, significance or value are not of primary concern on a quest for its meaning. Rather, let us look at the relationship between an object and the subject.

One final example:

  1. Your daughter smiles. (fact, situation, living meaning, objective, suchness meaning)
  2. You see your daughter’s smile and interpret this as meaningful. (small meaning, situational meaning, personal meaning, interpretation of the situation)
  3. You return your daughter’s smile and experience a meaningful moment. (life activity, behavior)


Or:

  1. Phenomenon in the life of an individual
  2. Goes through the (subjective) lens of the individual
  3. Result in a feeling or action dependant upon the personality structure of the individual that regulates behavior

 

Summing up

Meaning is the relationship between a phenomenon and a subject. It varies in scope and depends on context, personality, and beliefs and is subjective in nature.

Do you agree? Whether you do or do not, I would love to hear your thoughts in our comments section posted after the Recommended Reading.

 

Recommended Reading

Over the years, the subject of meaning has become a true passion of mine. If you are also interested in this subject, I highly recommend you order a copy of the following books:

  • Existential Psychotherapy by Irvin Yalom (and all other books by Irvin Yalom for that matter, but especially this one)
  • Meaning in Positive and Existential Psychology (brilliant collection of articles by Springer)
  • The Denial of Death by Ernest Becker (Becker’s best work, awarded with the Pulitzer price)
  • Man’s Search for Meaning by Victor Frankl (currently very trending and often cited in the field of PP)
  • Zona: A Book About a Film About a Journey to a Room by Geoff Dyer (a book about Tarkovski’s 1979 movie ‘Stalker’)
  • Meanings of Life by Roy Baumeister (diving into empirical studies)

Besides books, check out these articles written by Baumeister, Wong, Leontiev, Emmons and Mike Steger.

What I have found is that in asking the question ‘What is the meaning of life?’ and in finding possible answers to it, therein lies my primary sense of meaning.

Batthyany, A. & Russo-Netzer, P., 2014, Meaning in Existential and Positive Psychology, Chapter 1: Psychologies of Meaning

Frankl, V., 1946, Man’s Search for Meaning
Stephen Downes (Jan 09, 2009). Types of meaning. Retrieved from http://halfanhour.blogspot.com.es/2009/01/types-of-meaning.html

Leontiev, D.A., Three Facets of Meaning, Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, vol. 43, no. 6, November–December 2005, pp. 45–72.

Leontiev, D.A., The Phenomenon of Meaning: How Psychology Can Make Sense of It

Maslow, A., 1966, The Psychology of Science

Wong, Paul T.P., Wong L., McDonald, M.J., Klaassen, D.K., The Positive Psychology of Meaning and Spirituality. Abbotsford, BC: INPM Press, 2007. P. 33-44.

Wong, Paul T.P., Victor Frankl’s Meaning Seeking Model and Positive Psychology, Retrieved from http://www.drpaulwong.com/viktor-frankls-meaning-seeking-model-and-positive-psychology/

Yalom, Irvin D., 1980, Existential Psychotherapy

About the Author

With his work in positive psychology, Seph has been able to help tens of thousands of practitioners and educators all around the world. Seph strongly believes that we can deal with most of life’s absurdities by leveraging human connection and challenging ourselves, instead of using dogma or pharmaceutical drugs.

Comments

  1. Joaquin Andrade

    I’m an MD specialized in neuro immuno endocrinology. The meaning of life issue is increasingly seen in many patients with very different physical disorders. I realyy enjoyed and learned of, the article. Congrats to thr authors.

    Reply
  2. Yan Yan

    This article does not truly address the question……. First of all, what is “meaning”? Please note that, (1) there are things that are abstract but objective, e.g. 3+4=7, mathematics, logic,…. these are abstract but objective. Objective as they reflect the reality/are a part of the reality. (2) there are things that are abstract but not objective, e.g. beauty, love/disgust. These are some psychological/mental judgement of an individual. I believe “meaning” should be the (2) type of thing. So if we want to talk about “meaning of life”, what we should do is to find out the “cognitive conditions” that cause the feeling/cognition of “meaningful”, i.e. he finds that this event meaningful because of these cognitive conditions……
    Now when you see your daughter smiles and feeling it to be meaningful, I guess the hidden conditions behind are: you love your daughter, your daughter is a “good thing”, smiling is a “good thing”, ……. (must have more conditions but now I don’t know).
    I have been looking for the “cognitive conditions” that cause the feeling/cognition of “meaningful”. Still have to look for the answer.

    Reply
  3. Dan

    Is the Living Meaning, Personal Meaning & Life Activity breakdown your own model Seph?

    Reply
  4. Nyuiemedi

    Seph,
    This piece on meaning of meaning is mind blowing. when one considers how often we experience meaninglessness in our daily life and feel that life is awful and not worth living, then there is a crucial need for further study into the concept of meaning and developing some theoretical proposition to establish this area. Existentialism does provide some basis though, and so is positive psychology.
    I am very much interested in developing more insight into this. thanks for the marvelous work.

    Reply
  5. Sarwat Rattani

    Thank you for such thought provoking article. Even the discussion here brings new perspectives to mind. Would gladly explore this topic further.

    Reply
  6. Brad Desmond

    There may indeed be tangible benefits to intrinsic meaning, and if you possess such view of life, the universe and everything that affords intrinsic meaning you are fortunate in many ways. However, and allow a little provocation here, as George Bernard Shaw once said “The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one.”

    Reply
  7. Jerome Knoot

    Thank you Seph for introducing me to the subject of ‘meaning’. As I’m new to this field I didn’t fully understand the article, but I would like to discuss it further with you soon.

    Reply
    • Seph Fontane Pennock

      Thanks for stopping by and leaving a comment Jerome. Let’s discuss this over a drink sometime soon.

      Reply
  8. Antoinette

    All I know is that nobody knows if there is any “meaning.” For me there is absolutely no meaning in anything when there is not enough serotonin available in my brain, when I am depressed. It may be that living things continues to live and evolve, because there is a chemical that gives the “good” feeling of meaning? Just as social-bonding feels good with the help of oxytocin. If a person cannot feel anything then there is no meaning and without the neuro-chemicals there is no meaning. Perhaps the programmer did not program with an end or a meaning in mind only to feel good to see how the water paint finds its own meaningful path.

    Reply
    • Seph Fontane Pennock

      Very, very interesting point you’re making here Antoinette. You bring a new and different perspective to the table that I haven’t addressed in the article, or put much thought into so far. What you’re essentially saying is that meaning is an evolutionary phenomenon, something that keeps us (or at least some of us) from going completely mad and that increases our chances of procreation because the substance it provides us with keeps us keeping on. Love to explore this idea with you a bit further.

      Reply
    • Michelle

      Antoinette, I liked reading your comment. And i agree. In times of “darkness” is the times i look for meaning the hardest but do not find. And then instinctively opt for an external source to give meaning or rather to increase serotonin – like finding a victim to fall in love with.

      So the two walks hand in hand. I wish I knew which is the culprit is it the lack of meaning that causes the drop in chemicals in our brains or is it the drop in chemicals that causes the lack of meaning…

      Reply
  9. Sunitha Mathai

    Hey glad I read through this article that deliberated on the various purpose of “Meaning” itself.
    I have a comment on the side note with reference to Frankl:
    Having read his book I do quite agree with him that every moment has a meaning.This very moment of me deciding to leave a comment after having read this article has a deeper meaning for me that I can try understanding if I want to. He clearly emphasizes that due to our Freedom of Will which predominantly is a virtue of mankind helps us to find the Purpose of life through meaning.
    Thank you for the article once again

    Reply
  10. Paul Wong

    Frankl’s solution to the paradox of meaning by affirming that life has meaning has saved many lives from terrible situations. His leap of faith, similar to Kierkegaard’s leap of faith, is a courageous act. Faith belongs to the realm of metaphysics and presuppositions, philosophically, to believe life has meaning is just as absurd as to believe that life has meaning in the grand scheme of things. Given the abundant empirical evidence of the adaptive benefits of meaning and purpose for existence and well-being (Baumeister, 1991; Park, 2012; Steger, 2012, Wong, 2012), and there is sufficient evidence of orderliness in nature (Heintzelman & King, 2014), to believe that life has meaning seems more reasonable that to believe the opposite. In short, I feel that you need to provide a compelling logical argument or empirical evidence before you can conclude that to believe that life has meaning is to commit philosophical suicide.

    Reply
    • Seph Fontane Pennock

      Thank you for your thought-provoking comment Paul. Can you please explain the logic behind the connection of the orderliness in nature and ‘big’ meaning? The benefits of meaning are clear, but I don’t see how they form an argument for the existence of any kind of meaning. And who decides what reasonable is? Again, that is a term that implies subjectivity. It is a value judgment.

      Sorry that I did not make myself clear enough. I never meant to say that believing that life has meaning is to commit philosophical suicide. Not at all! What I said was the following:
      “According to Wong, the advantage of the belief in the intrinsic value of life is that is more functional than alternative global beliefs by facilitating the discovery of meaning of the moment. That, to me, is committing philosophical suicide. It is taking the Matrix’ blue pill.”

      What I mean to say is that to belief in something because of the benefits it yields, instead of because of its validity, is to commit philosophical suicide. Can you imagine a researcher deciding to truly believe in something because of the benefits of believing? That is not courageous in my opinion. It is selling out. To me, that would be like choosing hedonism over a truly virtuous life. There is no room for such pragmatism or selfishness in a genuine quest for the truth.

      Reply
      • Renea Mack

        Seph

        You said, “Can you imagine a researcher deciding to truly believe in something because of the benefits of believing?” What about the researcher who truly believes in something because its True and just so happens to have benefits? We can play around with definitions of meaning but how do would you do that with a person who has lost their family in a tragic accident. They will be demanding the meaning of life in order to cope with the troubles they are facing…the ultimate definition of meaning is a simple question: What is the purpose of life? To answer this question you must then ask: Does absolute truth exist? if it doesn’t then you can’t be sure of anything and meaning is solely relative which as philosophers we can’t accept that because then that means we would be making an absolute statement. Even the post-modernists who says there is not truth is making an absolute statement affirming absolute truth. As Mr. Wong has stated the literature is very rich with empirical evidence on the importance of believing in intrinsic value versus anything contrary and if this is what keeps people mentally healthy (which is a major goal of positive psychology) then why are you so against it? Intrinsic value is interwoven into what absolute truth is which just so happen to have the exceedingly abundant wealth of positive benefits.

        Reply
        • Seph Fontane Pennock

          Hi there Renea – thank you for challenging my thoughts. That was one of the reasons why I wrote this article – to challenge my logic and assumptions.

          I’m going to have to disregard the example of a person who has just lost his or her family in a tragic accident, because it has nothing to do with an objective quest for meaning or truth. Instead, it blurs one’s vision.

          The other question you raise is a very important one; does absolute truth exist? Let me ask you this: does gravity exist? Does ‘the speed of light’ exist? The answer to a question like that would be: ‘yes, within a certain set of predefined conditions’. I think the same can be said about absolute truth, which is why it is not absolute. But in the same way as we came to discover – and can count on – the speed of light, we can discover things that are, insofar possible, true about life or its meaning. Regardless of the benefits that that knowledge might or might not yield. As I pointed out in my comment to Paul, I don’t think that that type of pragmatism enhances philosophical or scientific inquiry.

          Reply
  11. Janet

    A note on your first sidenote.

    Sidenote:
    The paradoxical thing is that a grand design seems to offer people comfort. 

    This sidenote reminds me of a similar thought I used to have when people would say – you’re not alone in your suffering – don’t feel bad, everyone has bad things happen to them – in all its different variants. My reaction was to recoil and think, why would you think that knowing that other people suffer would make me feel any better? It doesn’t at all. However, I have since experienced what I think those people meant when they said those things. In a 12-step context I have heard other people speak about pain, mistakes, longings and often heard what my own heart was feeling. It made me feel an identity with other people that I hadn’t felt before – to feel kinship. We are all just imperfect people and we all suffer. And through that recognition, and the feelings of compassion that I felt for their pain, I came to recognize that I, too, am only human, and to have compassion for myself. So hearing other people’s pain has made me feel better – but it wasn’t about feeling good because someone else is unhappy like it sounded to me before.

    In regard to a grand design offering people comfort – I don’t agree that it is paradoxical. Consider a general in a war – sending soldiers into battle knowing that some will be killed in horrible ways. Does that make the general a sadist? The soldiers might actually choose to fight and perhaps die for a cause beyond their personal well-being, and find comfort in trying to be the best soldier they can be, and believing that they are protecting people they love. Of course, in a war the soldiers hopefully know what they are fighting for. How about this – think of yourself as being a single cell of a body containing billions of cells. The grand design is the intentions of this body as it moves through its world, interacting with other like it at its own scale, trying to survive, trying to find meaning. Meanwhile, the cells that make up this body are dividing, living and dying. Sometimes this body stumbles and scrapes its knee, a couple of thousand cells are killed in a catastrophic event. For me, the problem it isn’t with believing that something larger than myself exists and has a plan, the problem is with believing that the larger-than-myself thing could be all powerful and all-knowing and not come up with a way to implement its plan without all the suffering. 🙂

    Reply
  12. Elorm Akpatsa

    Thanks for this article. It is helpful and carries weight. I want to read more on this topic

    Reply
    • Seph Fontane Pennock

      Check out some of the recommended readings if you’re ready to take the plunge Elorm!

      Reply
  13. Mike Oppland

    Hey Seph. Firstly. fantastic article. I enjoyed how you compared and contrasted the different components of “meaning.” It was very interesting how you included various psychological interpretations of meaning.

    I wanted to comment on your sidenote about Frankl’s belief that every moment contains meaning. I found this very relevant to the reading I am doing at the moment because I am currently reading a lot of Eckhart Tolle. I have read Frankl’s A Man’s Search for Meaning, so I am aware of how he determined “meaning” after being subjected to years in a concentration camp. What I believe he is saying, which ties in nicely with a lot of Tolle’s philosophy, is that every moment can be a meaningful moment if one chooses to accept it as such. If one lives completely present in the moment, observes what is going on in that moment from the light swishing of a tree in the wind or the gently tapping from the keys on a laptop, he or she is living a completely meaningful life. Perhaps that is why Frankl describes meaning the way he does because merely having another moment to live is very meaningful for him given what he went through. But don’t we also have the opportunity to view every moment this way? As a gift? If we choose to not allow our ego mind to dictate which moments we find meaningful and which moments we don’t, than perhaps all of them can be meaningful in some way.

    Thanks again for the great article. Hope all is well.

    Reply
    • Seph Fontane Pennock

      Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this matter Mike. They serve as a nice addition and invite further exploration. What you are basically saying is that meaning is subjective and that mindfulness can allow us to experience more of this subjective meaning throughout our daily lives. I am in complete agreement with you on those points.

      The point I was trying to make in that sidenote is that there is no top-down ‘objective’ meaning for us to worry about and that that is quite a relief, really.

      Reply
    • Cees

      My understanding was and is, that – ultimately – every moment, experience, can be a meaningful moment and/or experience. The key here is the word ‘ultimately’. The meaning and beauty will not always be immediately obvious. Sometimes it must first be ‘lived through’, absorbed, accepted, before the meaning and beauty can be seen. that’s why one of my few life motto’s is: “every experience is, in th end, an enriching experience”.

      Reply
      • Sharon

        Cecel, I agree with you. Self – reflection can be an important aspect of recognizing meaning in a situation.

        Reply
  14. Shirley

    Fantastic, really made me think… I think the meaning in life is what I believe Thank you!!

    Reply
    • Seph Fontane Pennock

      Glad to hear it made you think Shirley. Thanks for stopping by 🙂

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *