What Is Mental Contrasting?
To explain mental contrasting, let’s first explore the principles of fantasy realization theory.
In her description of the theory, Oettingen (1999), highlights that a person can maximize their commitment to goals by balancing positive and negative perspectives of an impending reality.
The style of thinking that focuses on the positive aspects of an impending reality is referred to as free fantasy.
Free fantasies are imagined future events or behaviors that do not consider the likelihood of their actual occurrence (Klinger, 1990). For instance, a person may fantasize about receiving a promotion and getting a new corner office, even if this is unlikely to happen in reality.
In contrast, a person may focus on the negative aspects of a future situation, such as the late hours that would inevitably go into earning such a promotion.
According to Oettingen (1999), a person may deal with their fantasies and impending reality in one of three ways. The chosen approach will impact that person’s readiness and likelihood of making their fantasy a reality via goal pursuit and achievement.
First, a person may simply indulge in positive fantasies about the future and ignore the downsides of an impending reality.
Second, a person may solely reflect on the negative aspects of a future reality, ignoring their positive fantasies.
The danger of both of these approaches is that they threaten to cap a person’s total possible level of commitment toward achieving a goal. To understand why, consider the following scenario:
A man wishes to buy a new Ferrari. Initially, the man may find himself captivated by images of himself driving along the coast with the roof down; he fantasizes about smiling to passersby, who are admiring his new vehicle.
This positive imagined reality may motivate him to begin saving for the car, but when the reality of how much work is involved in saving for such a lavish purchase sets in, he loses motivation and settles for a cheaper car.
An alternative scenario is that the man is considering saving for a Ferrari, but he dwells on the substantial amount of work and sacrifice that will be required to buy it: late nights at the office, disciplined budgeting, and so forth.
Consequently, these images of the reality involved in goal pursuit dampen his enthusiasm, and once again, he settles for a cheaper car.
In both scenarios, the man has failed to achieve his goal. But there is a third option.
The man could choose to balance fantasizing positively about owning a Ferrari while also contrasting these fantasies with negative aspects of his impending reality, such as the sacrifice involved in saving to make the purchase.
The process of comparing and contrasting these positive and negative aspects of an impending future is what is known as mental contrasting. And the process of mental contrasting is valuable, as it triggers expectancies that can guide decisions about goal commitment and motivate sustained goal pursuit.
Mental contrasting and expectancy judgments
Expectancies are judgments about the likelihood that particular events will occur (Bandura, 1977). In the context of mental contrasting and fantasy realization theory, expectancies pertain to the likelihood of achieving a goal regarding a desired future.
By engaging in mental contrasting and triggering expectancy judgments, a person can avoid over-committing to a goal that is unlikely to be attained as a result of too much free fantasy, such as the reasonably unrealistic goal of becoming an overnight internet celebrity or millionaire.
Likewise, through mental contrasting, a person can avoid under-committing to a goal that is easily within reach due to focusing too narrowly on negative or challenging aspects of an impending future.
For instance, it would be a shame to give up on completing your studies just because they are challenging when you are only a semester away from obtaining your degree. And in such a case, a little fantasizing about what it would be like to attend graduation and be qualified for competitive jobs may help motivate such a student to reach the finish line.
By balancing the positive and negative aspects of an impending future, a person can strive toward goals while planning realistically for the challenges that will arise on the path to goal achievement.
The Process of Mental Contrasting
We know from research that our subconscious mind tends to operate with a focus on short timeframes.
It does not understand long-term goals and achievements but rather focuses on staying happy at any given moment.
With positive thinking and free fantasy, we allow our subconscious minds to indulge in the feeling that ‘everything is okay.’ This explains the immediate surge of motivation that accompanies fantasizing about desired futures.
However, such motivation is often short lived without equal consideration of the process for sustaining happiness through goal pursuit. Consequently, people may give up on their fantasies and fall into a cycle of feeling positive one moment and negative the next.
By practicing mental contrasting, such cycles can be avoided through the anticipation of challenges. For example, if an overweight person is practicing mental contrasting, they will imagine their ideal body and, at the same time, will be aware of how hard the workout sessions will likely be.
The process and the product of goal pursuit are both transparent when engaging in mental contrasting. And, as a result, the person in this scenario should be more likely to achieve their goal without giving up before their target weight is reached.
Practicing mental contrasting using WOOP
At the core of most mental contrasting interventions is a practice Oettingen refers to as WOOP.
Each of the four letters in the acronym WOOP stands for a step in the mental contrasting process that can help prepare an individual to sustain goal pursuit by energizing both the conscious and unconscious mind (WoopMyLife.org, n.d.).
The WOOP acronym functions as a goal-setting exercise.
Psychologists or coaches may find it helpful to build the WOOP exercise into one of their existing client-management or onboarding tools as a way to establish the focus of their sessions early in a coaching or counseling relationship.
For instance, in the visual example provided, we have built the four-step WOOP exercise into an activity that clients can complete at their convenience via smartphone or tablet using the coaching tool Quenza.
Let’s now take a closer look at each letter of the WOOP acronym.
W – Wish
Mental contrasting starts with a component of desire. In this first step, a person will be prompted to think about a key concern, desire, or wish pertaining to one life domain and visualize it.
For example, a person may wish to receive a promotion at their job or re-enter the dating scene.
O – Outcome
Next, a person is prompted to think about the ideal outcome of having their wish come true. This usually encompasses an emotional component, such as how a person will feel once their goal is accomplished or how achieving the goal would fundamentally change their life.
For example, the person who wishes for a promotion may imagine the excitement associated with the challenge of a new role. Likewise, the person looking to start dating again may imagine themselves feeling a greater sense of connectedness and joy upon meeting a prospective partner.
Importantly, the person is encouraged to really pause and allow themselves time to imagine what this outcome would feel like, energizing the mind to begin pursuing that outcome (Oettingen et al., 2009).
O – Obstacles
The third part of the process grounds the person and their goals in reality. In this step, a person reflects on the possible hurdles and difficulties they may face while striving toward their desired state.
When focusing on hurdles, a person is encouraged to focus on the internal aspects of the self that may hamper goal achievement, rather than things beyond their control. For instance, the person seeking a promotion may recognize in themselves a tendency to experience imposter syndrome or low self-confidence.
Once again, the person completing the WOOP exercise is encouraged to pause and reflect fully on such impending challenges, imagining how they would play out in reality.
P – Planning
The final stage of mental contrasting involves making an if–then plan, sometimes referred to as setting implementation intentions (Gollwitzer & Brandstätter, 1997).
The person completing the WOOP worksheet focuses on one of the obstacles they encountered in the previous stage. They are then prompted to make a plan to address it: If I encounter obstacle X, then I will respond with action Y.
For example, the person looking to re-enter the dating scene may realistically anticipate that they will experience nerves in the lead-up to a first date, tempting them to cancel. In response to this anticipated challenge, the person practicing WOOP may make a plan to talk through their anxieties with a friend or practice mindful breathing should such anxieties arise.
This is the stage that researchers suggest sets mental contrasting apart from other types of interventions. This is because it enables someone to enact a pre-planned script in the face of inevitable challenges, thereby supporting goal pursuit.
What our readers think
NLP – Meta Programs – are based on the brains natural abilities to move “towards something, or away from” and to review variations in Well formed outcomes. We’re doing these process’s naturally; when we unpack the process consciously we can even uncover the “hidden away from patterns” that often seem to derail outcomes.
Its really wonderful to see these early findings in NLP which are some 40 years old now are showing up in the study of neuroscience.
Great post! Learnt a lot reading it. Never thought about it.
Wow, I didn’t realise I have been doing this all my life, it actually has a name. Thank you
I am a learning coach and this is great stuff for me
Thank you very much it helps me to grow