Theory Behind the Solution-Focused Approach
The solution-focused approach of SFBT is founded in de Shazer and Berg’s idea that the solutions to one’s problems are typically found in the “exceptions” to the problem, meaning the times when the problem is not actively affecting the individual (Iveson, 2002).
This approach is a logical one—to find a lasting solution to a problem, it is rational to look first at those times in which the problem lacks its usual potency.
For example, if a client is struggling with excruciating shyness, but typically has no trouble speaking to his or her coworkers, a solution-focused therapist would target the client’s interactions at work as an exception to the client’s usual shyness. Once the client and therapist have discovered an exception, they will work as a team to find out how the exception is different from the client’s usual experiences with the problem.
The therapist will help the client formulate a solution based on what sets the exception scenario apart, and aid the client in setting goals and implementing the solution.
You may have noticed that this type of therapy relies heavily on the therapist and client working together. Indeed, SFBT works on the assumption that every individual has at least some level of motivation to address their problem or problems and to find solutions that improve their quality of life.
This motivation on the part of the client is an essential piece of the model that drives SFBT (Miller & Rollnick, 2013).
Solution-Focused Model
While there is no formalized “A leads to B, which leads to C” sort of model for SFBT, there is a general model that acts as the foundation for this type of therapy.
Solution-focused theorists and therapists believe that generally, people develop default problem patterns based on their experiences, as well as default solution patterns.
These patterns dictate an individual’s usual way of experiencing a problem and his or her usual way of coping with problems (Focus on Solutions, 2013).
The solution-focused model holds that focusing only on problems is not an effective way of solving them. Instead, SFBT targets clients’ default solution patterns, evaluates them for efficacy, and modifies or replaces them with problem-solving approaches that work (Focus on Solutions, 2013).
In addition to this foundational belief, the SFBT model is based on the following assumptions:
- Change is constant and certain;
- Emphasis should be on what is changeable and possible;
- Clients must want to change;
- Clients are the experts in therapy and must develop their own goals;
- Clients already have the resources and strengths to solve their problems;
- Therapy is short-term;
- The focus must be on the future—a client’s history is not a key part of this type of therapy (Counselling Directory, 2017).
Based on these assumptions, the model instructs therapists to do the following in their sessions with clients:
- Ask questions rather than “selling” answers;
- Notice and reinforce evidence of the client’s positive qualities, strengths, resources, and general competence to solve their own problems;
- Work with what people can do rather than focusing on what they can’t do;
- Pinpoint the behaviors a client is already engaging in that are helpful and effective and find new ways to facilitate problem-solving through these behaviors;
- Focus on the details of the solution instead of the problem;
- Develop action plans that work for the client (Focus on Solutions, 2013).
SFBT therapists aim to bring out the skills, strengths, and abilities that clients already possess rather than attempting to build new competencies from scratch. This assumption of a client’s competence is one of the reasons this therapy can be administered in a short timeframe—it is much quicker to harness the resources clients already have than to create and nurture new resources.
Beyond these basic activities, there are many techniques and exercises used in SFBT to promote problem-solving and enhance clients’ ability to work through their own problems.
Popular Techniques and Interventions
While some of these techniques are used specifically in SFBT, others have applicability to a wide range of therapies, or even to individuals working on solving their problems without the guidance of a therapist.
Working with a therapist is generally recommended when you are facing overwhelming or particularly difficult problems, but not all problems require a licensed professional to solve.
For each technique listed below, it will be noted if it can be used as a standalone technique.
Questions
Asking good questions is vital in any form of therapy, but SFBT formalized this practice into a technique that specifies a certain set of questions intended to provoke thinking and discussion about goal-setting and problem-solving.
One such question is the “coping question.” This question is intended to help clients recognize their own resiliency and identify some of the ways in which they already cope with their problems effectively.
There are many ways to phrase this sort of question, but generally, a coping question is worded something like, “How do you manage, in the face of such difficulty, to fulfill your daily obligations?” (Antin, 2018).
Another type of question common in SFBT is the “miracle question.” The miracle question encourages clients to imagine a future in which their problems are no longer affecting their lives. Imagining this desired future will help clients see a path forward, both allowing them to believe in the possibility of this future and helping them to identify concrete steps they can take to make it happen.
This question is generally asked in the following manner: “Imagine that a miracle has occurred. This problem you are struggling with is suddenly absent from your life. What does your life look like without this problem?” (Antin, 2018).
If the miracle question is unlikely to work, or if the client is having trouble imagining this miracle future, the SFBT therapist can use “best hopes” questions instead. The client’s answers to these questions will help establish what the client is hoping to achieve and help him or her set realistic and achievable goals.
The “best hopes” questions can include the following:
- What are your best hopes for today’s session?
- What needs to happen in this session to enable you to leave thinking it was worthwhile?
- How will you know things are “good enough” for our sessions to end?
- What needs to happen in these sessions so that your relatives/friends/coworkers can say, “I’m really glad you went to see [the therapist]”? (Vinnicombe, n.d.).
To identify the exceptions to the problems plaguing clients, therapists will ask “exception questions.” These are questions that ask about clients’ experiences both with and without their problems. This helps to distinguish between circumstances in which the problems are most active and the circumstances in which the problems either hold no power or have diminished power over clients’ moods or thoughts.
Exception questions can include:
- Tell me about the times when you felt the happiest;
- What was it about that day that made it a better day?
- Can you think of times when the problem was not present in your life? (Counselling Directory, 2017).
Another question frequently used by SFBT practitioners is the “scaling question.”
It asks clients to rate their experiences (such as how their problems are currently affecting them, how confident they are in their treatment, and how they think the treatment is progressing) on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest). This helps the therapist to gauge progress and learn more about clients’ motivation and confidence in finding a solution.
For example, an SFBT therapist may ask, “On a scale from 0 to 10, how would you rate your progress in finding and implementing a solution to your problem?” (Antin, 2018).
Do One Thing Different
This exercise can be completed individually, but the handout may need to be modified for adult or adolescent users.
This exercise is intended to help the client or individual to learn how to break his or her problem patterns and build strategies to simply make things go better.
The handout breaks the exercise into the following steps (Coffen, n.d.):
Step One
- Think about the things you do in a problem situation. Change any part you can. Choose to change one thing, such as the timing, your body patterns (what you do with your body), what you say, the location, or the order in which you do things;
- Think of a time that things did not go well for you. When does that happen? What part of that problem situation will you do differently now?
Step Two
- Think of something done by somebody else does that makes the problem better. Try doing what they do the next time the problem comes up. Or, think of something that you have done in the past that made things go better. Try doing that the next time the problem comes up;
- Think of something that somebody else does that works to make things go better. What is the person’s name and what do they do that you will try?
- Think of something that you have done in the past that helped make things go better. What did you do that you will do next time?
Step Three
- Feelings tell you that you need to do something. Your brain tells you what to do. Understand what your feelings are but do not let them determine your actions. Let your brain determine the actions;
- Feelings are great advisors but poor masters (advisors give information and help you know what you could do; masters don’t give you choices);
- Think of a feeling that used to get you into trouble. What feeling do you want to stop getting you into trouble?
- Think of what information that feeling is telling you. What does the feeling suggest you should do that would help things go better?
Step Four
- Change what you focus on. What you pay attention to will become bigger in your life and you will notice it more and more. To solve a problem, try changing your focus or your perspective.
- Think of something that you are focusing on too much. What gets you into trouble when you focus on it?
- Think of something that you will focus on instead. What will you focus on that will not get you into trouble?
Step Five
- Imagine a time in the future when you aren’t having the problem you are having right now. Work backward to figure out what you could do now to make that future come true;
- Think of what will be different for you in the future when things are going better;
- Think of one thing that you would be doing differently before things could go better in the future. What one thing will you do differently?
Step Six
- Sometimes people with problems talk about how other people cause those problems and why it’s impossible to do better. Change your story. Talk about times when the problem was not happening and what you were doing at that time. Control what you can control. You can’t control other people, but you can change your actions, and that might change what other people do;
- Think of a time when you were not having the problem that is bothering you. Talk about that time.
Step Seven
- If you believe in a god or a higher power, focus on God to get things to go better. When you are focused on God or you are asking God to help you, things might go better for you.
- Do you believe in a god or a higher power? Talk about how you will seek help from your god to make things go better.
What our readers think
Thank you. I’m about to start an MMFT internship, and SFBT is the model I prefer. You put everything in perspective.
Great insights. I have a client who has become a bit disengaged with our work together. This gives me a really helpful new approach for our upcoming sessions. He’s very focused on the problem and wanting a “quick fix.” This might at least get us on that path. Thank you!
Hi Courtney, great paper! I will like to know more about the limitations to SFT and noticed that you provided an intext citation to Antin 2016. Would you be able to provide the full reference? Thank you!
Hi Edith,
Thank you for bringing this to our attention. The reference has now been updated in the reference list — this should be Antin (2018):
Antin, L. (2018). Solution-focused brief therapy (SFBT). Good Therapy. Retrieved from https://www.goodtherapy.org/learn-about-therapy/types/solution-focused-therapy
– Nicole | Community Manager
The only thing tat was revealed to me while reading this article is the client being able to recognize the downfall of what got them into their problem in the first place.
I felt that maybe a person should understand the problem to the extent that they may understand how to recognize what led to the problem in the first place. Understanding the process of how something broke down would give one knowledge and wisdom that may be able to be applied in future instances when something may go wrong again. Even if the thing is new (machine or person) having the wisdom and understanding of the cause that led to the effect may help prevent and or overcome an arising problem in the future.
Not being able to recognize the process that brought down the machine and or human may be like adhering to ignorance, although they say ignorance is bliss in case of an emergency it would be better to be informed rather then blindly ignorant, as the knowledge of how the problem surfaced in the first place may alleviate unwarranted suffering sooner rather than later.
But then again looking at it this way I may work myself out of a job if my clients never came back to see me. However is it about me or them or the greater societal structural good that we can induce through our education, skills, training, experience, and good will good faith effort to instill social justice coupled with lasting change for the betterment of human society and the world as a whole.
Very very helpful, thank you for writing.
Just one point “While no respectable psychologist would disagree that an individual is generally in control of his or her own actions and, therefore, future, there is considerable debate about what level of influence other factors have on an individual’s life.”
I think any psychologist that has worked in neurological dysfunction would probably acknowledge consciousness and ‘voluntary control’ are not that straight-forward. Generally though, I suppose there’s that whole debate of if we are ever in control of our actions or even our thoughts. It may well boil down to what we mean by ‘we’, as in what are we? A bundle of fibres acting on memories and impulses? A unique body of energy guided by intangible forces?
Maybe I am not a respectable psychologist 🙂
This article provided me with insight on how to proceed with a role-play session in my CBT graduate course. Thank you!
Hi Derrick,
That’s fantastic that you were able to find some guidance in this post. Best of luck with your grad students!
– Nicole | Community Manager
Hi Nicole! I am Teri Harmon Malinowski, studying for a Masters of Clinical Psychology and would like to reference Ms. Ackerman’s article. May I ask you to forward correct citation?
Thank you!
Hi Teri,
You can reference this article in APA 7th as follows: Ackerman, C.E. (2017, September 28). What is Solution-Focused Therapy: 3 Essential Techniques. PositivePsychology.com. https://positivepsychology.com/solution-focused-therapy/
Hope this helps!
Warm regards,
Julia | Community Manager
thank you so much
Thank You…Great input and clarity . I now have light…
I was looking everywhere for a simple explanation for my essay and this is it!! thank you so much for this is was very useful and I learned a lot.
Very well done. Thank you for the multitude of insights.
Thank you for such a good passage discussed. I really have a great time understanding it.