How do we move ourselves – and others – to act? It all hinges on motivation.
People are often motivated to act by external influences, be they financial reward, prestige, advancement, or the opinions of others. Yet, just as often, people are motivated from within, by their beliefs and personal values.
While extrinsic motivation is not necessarily a bad thing, it is intrinsic motivation that most effectively encourages and sustains action. We need to feel autonomous – that we are the authors and agents of our behavior rather than feeling that external forces control our behavior.
Self-Determination is primarily concerned with intrinsically driven motivation and shines a light on the interplay between the external factors and internal motives inherent in human nature.
The following article will examine the concept of self-determination, answer common questions on the subject, and take a look at some activities, assessments, and worksheets to develop and improve self-determination skills.
This article contains:
- What is Self-Determination?
- A Look at the Concept in Psychology
- Common Questions on Self-Determination
- 8 Self-Determination Skills to Utilize Today
- 7 Useful Activities and Worksheets (incl. PDF)
- Daily Motivational Awareness Exercise
- Basic Needs Satisfaction Through Communication Exercise
- 5 Assessments, Tests and Questionnaires
- 6 Books Worth Reading
- A Take-Home Message
What is Self-Determination?
Self-determination began as a political concept whereby a group of people could form their own state and choose their own government (UNPO, 2017). After World War II, the promotion and support of self-determination became one of the primary goals of the United Nations. In psychology, self-determination refers to an individual’s ability to make choices and manage their own life.
Self-Determination Theory (SDT) is an approach to human motivation that emphasizes the importance of humans’ evolved inner resources for personality development and behavioral self-regulation (Ryan, Kuhl, & Deci, 1997). Deci (1992) recognized the motivational dynamics that determine the activities an individual chooses to do freely and those activities they feel coerced or compelled to partake.
Similarly, Wehmeyer (1998) defined self-determination as the primary causal agent that encourages decision-making, which is free from external influence. According to Field et al. (1998), an understanding of one’s strengths and limitations, together with a belief in oneself as capable and competent, are essential to self-determination.
When acting on the basis of these skills and attitudes, individuals have a greater ability to take control of their lives and engage in goal-directed, self-regulated, autonomous behavior.
In essence, self-determination is a combination of skills, knowledge, and beliefs that allow the individual to choose and to act in accordance with those choices rather than reinforcement contingencies, drives, or other external pressures.
A Look at the Concept in Psychology
As a psychological construct, self-determination is a theory of motivation and personality that addresses issues of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation concerning universal, innate psychological needs. These needs are thought to be essential for growth and integration, constructive social development, and personal well-being (Ryan & Deci, 2000).
SDT postulates that humans have three innate psychological needs, namely:
- the need for competence (feeling effective),
- the need for autonomy (the feeling of being the origin of one’s behavior), and
- the need for psychological relatedness (feeling cared for and understood by other people) (Ryan & Deci, 2000).
The satisfaction and fulfillment of these three needs are considered necessary and essential to vital, healthy human functioning regardless of culture or stage of development (Silva, 2011).
When these three needs are met, individuals experience more vitality, self‐motivation, and well‐being. Conversely, circumvention of these basic needs may lead to declining self‐motivation and a heightened sense of ill‐being (Ryan et al. 2006).
Self-determination theory developed through a set of six ‘mini‐theories,’ which represent a broad framework for the study of human motivation and personality. Together these six mini‐theories constitute SDT:
- Cognitive Evaluation Theory is concerned with intrinsic motivation and how factors such as rewards, deadlines, feedback, and pressure affect feelings of autonomy and competence.
- Organismic Integration Theory is concerned with extrinsic motivation in its various forms and addresses the process of internalization of various extrinsic motives.
- Causality Orientations Theory is concerned with individual differences in tendencies to orient toward environments and regulate behavior in various ways.
- Basic Psychological Needs Theory elaborates on the concept of the three basic psychological needs by connecting them directly with wellness.
- Goal Contents Theory is concerned with the distinctions between intrinsic and extrinsic goals and their impact on motivation and wellness.
- Relationships Motivation Theory is concerned with the development and maintenance of close personal relationships and encompasses one of the three basic psychological needs: psychological relatedness.
Common Questions on Self-Determination
Why Is Self-Determination So Important?
The promotion and procurement of self-determination skills can help individuals of all ages, with or without disabilities, to assert personal control over their choices in life.
Self-determination plays a vital role in several contexts. It has been shown to increase life satisfaction in later life (Ekelund, Dahlin-Ivanoff, & Ekelund, 2014), promote physical activity and weight loss (Silva et al., 2010; Teixeira et al., 2012), moderate occupational burnout (Fernet, Guay, & Senecal, 2004), and motivation (Gagné & Deci, 2005) among many others.
Within an educational setting, the integration of self-determination skills such as self-regulation, decision-making, and action planning, has been shown to help students evaluate and set personal goals, become more autonomous, self-determined learners, and increase the sense of control over their learning (Eisenman, 2007).
According to Ryan & Deci (2000), when young adults develop the ability to consider and implement solutions to their problems, they become intrinsically motivated and actively engaged in the learning process.
Wehmeyer (2005) discussed a common misconception that people with severe disabilities lack the requisite skills to exert control in their lives. While it is true that individuals with severe disabilities may be limited in the degree to which they can become more self-determined, by encouraging the expression of preferences and promoting self-advocacy, there are opportunities for them to become causal agents in their own lives.
A study by Wehmeyer & Palmer (2003) found that students with disabilities who took part in a self-determination program were more likely to live independently and move out of the family home, to hold a job, and have greater financial independence.
Is Self-Determined Behavior Always ‘Successful’ Behavior?
Self-determination has been linked to myriad positive outcomes, and perhaps unsurprisingly, there is a tendency to equate self-determined behavior with successful behaviors: however, even self-determined people experience failure. According to Wehmeyer (2005), the emphasis should be on the attempt to exercise control and not on the specific outcome of actions.
Self-determination should not be equated only with successful outcomes – not every decision an individual makes turns out to be an optimal decision, nor is every goal the right goal.
What Are The Primary Assumptions of Self-Determination?
According to Deci & Ryan (1985), self-determination consists of two key assumptions. The first is that the innate human need for growth drives behavior. Put simply, people are actively directed toward growth, gaining mastery over challenges, and taking in new experiences to develop a cohesive sense of self.
The second assumption focuses on the importance of autonomous motivation that has been linked to greater psychological health and more effective performance (Deci & Ryan, 2008). While individuals can be motivated by external factors such as money and acclaim, self-determination theory focuses primarily on internal sources of motivation, such as a need to gain knowledge or independence (Silva, Marques, & Teixeira, 2014).
What Techniques Are Used In Self-Determination Interventions?
Interventions based on self-determination theory comprise many behavioral and communicative techniques that focus on the satisfaction of needs and autonomy. Reeve & Jang (2006) emphasized the importance of autonomy-based interventions within education, healthcare, parenting, and the workplace.
This focus on personal autonomy can include taking the clients’ perspective, creating opportunities for client input and initiative, and providing explanatory rationales for requests made by the practitioner.
Additionally, many self-determination interventions are concerned with the support of competence and psychological relatedness needs. Many of the techniques used to support competence focus on promoting a sense of satisfaction by making progress toward self-referenced goals, attaining mastery, and developing self-determination skills (Soenens, & Dochy, 2009).
Are Self-determination and Self-efficacy the Same?
According to Sugarman & Sokol (2012), self-determination and self-efficacy are both based on the ideology that people are agents of their actions – that humans possess complex internal structures that allow them to make choices regarding their actions. While the two theories work from a similar ideology, they also view the concept of agency from very different perspectives.
Self-efficacy reflects the capacity of individuals to take measures to achieve targeted goals (Bandura, 1997). In terms of self-efficacy, enhanced perceptions of competency lead to perceived controllability – it is an individual’s self-efficacy that drives their agency. Put simply, people act when they feel able to achieve the goal(s) they have set.
While self-determination theory recognizes that feelings of competence are important, autonomy plays a more central role. When an individual perceives their actions as autonomous, then self-determined motivation is the main element of agency (Sweet, Forther, Strachan, & Blanchard (2012).
8 Self-Determination Skills to Utilize Today
While self-determination is a complex construct that includes a combination of skills and knowledge, these skills are teachable, measurable, and most effectively developed through regular practice. According to Wehmeyer, Agran, & Hughes (1998), the component skills of self-determined behavior are:
1. Choice Making Skills
Choice making is an individual’s ability to express their preference between two or more options (Wehman, 2006), and provides opportunities to exert control over his or her actions and environment.
2. Decision Making Skills
Similar to choice-making, decision-making requires effective judgments about what choices or solutions are right at any given moment. According to Wehman (2007), effective decision making requires individuals to identify possible alternatives for action, the potential consequences of each action, assess the probability of each result occurring, select the best alternative, and implement the alternative decision.
3. Problem-Solving Skills
Problem-solving requires the identification of a problem, possible solutions, and an understanding of the potential pros and cons of each solution.
4. Goal Setting and Attainment Skills
Goal setting and attainment skills are a critical component in the development of abilities that lead to agentic action and self-determination.
5. Self-Regulation Skills (including self-observation, evaluation, and reinforcement)
Self-regulation is the process by which people incorporate behavioral change into their everyday lives (Kapp, 2001). Self-regulation involves setting goals, developing a plan to achieve goals, implementing, and following the action plan, evaluating the outcomes of the action plan, and adjusting accordingly. Find more self-regulation tools here.
6. Self Advocacy Skills
Self-advocacy refers to an individual’s ability to express their needs and wants assertively and take action on their own behalf. More on this topic in How to Foster Self-expression.
7. Positive Self-Efficacy (including an internal locus of control)
Self-efficacy with an internal locus of control encourages individuals to believe in their ability to perform and achieve goals.
8. Self-Awareness Skills
Self-awareness skills allow individuals to identify and understand his or her needs, strengths, and limitations.
7 Useful Activities and Worksheets (incl. PDF)
The following worksheets are designed to assist in the development of the component skills of self-determined behavior.
Daily Motivational Awareness Exercise
According to Self-Determination Theory (Ryan & Deci, 2000), the motivational orientation that guides behavior has significant consequences for self-regulation and psychological well-being.
This brief exercise can be used to increase awareness of motivation in daily life and to become aware of the extent to which the motivation of daily activities is characterized by autonomy.
In short, this activity is about taking time to notice factors that influence motivation and which actions to pursue.
Basic Needs Satisfaction Through Communication Exercise
The goal of this group exercise is to utilize communication styles that promote the basic psychological needs of autonomy, competence, and relatedness and to facilitate behavioral change.
The Basic Needs Satisfaction Through Communication activity allows opportunities to evaluate, discuss, and learn through observation and is particularly useful for individuals in leadership positions who wish to effectively motivate others to take desired actions and make desired changes.
You can access this exercise in the Positive Psychology Toolkit, where you will find comprehensive instructions, example scenarios, and rating forms.
5 Assessments, Tests and Questionnaires
1. The Basic Needs Satisfaction in General Scale (BNSG-S; Gagné, 2003)
This 21 item scale measures the three distinct needs of autonomy, competence, and relatedness with the emphasis that all three needs must be individually met for wellness. The BNSG-S was developed to assess the satisfaction of basic psychological needs in general.
Respondents are invited to indicate how true each statement is for them personally and respond on a scale from 1 (Not at all true) to 7 (Very true). Higher scores are indicative of a higher level of satisfaction of needs.
2. AIR Self-Determination Assessments
The American Institutes for Research developed AIR Self-Determination Assessments in conjunction with Columbia University. Designed for use with adolescents, these assessments can be used to measure two broad components of self-determination:
a) the knowledge, abilities, and perceptions that enable self-determination, and
b) the opportunity to use the relevant knowledge and abilities.
The AIR Self-Determination Scale produces a profile of the student’s level of self-determination, identifies areas of strength and areas needing improvement, and identifies specific educational goals.
- AIR Self-Determination Student Form
- AIR Self-Determination Parent Form
- AIR Self-Determination Educator Form
You can find guidance on how to use and interpret the results of the AIR assessments here.
3. The ARC Self-Determination Scale (Wehmeyer & Kelchner, 1995)
The ARC Self-Determination Scale was developed to assess the self-determination strengths and weaknesses of adolescents with disabilities and to facilitate client involvement in determining goals. On completion of the assessment scores for autonomy, self-regulation, psychological empowerment, self-realization, and finally, an overall rating for self-determination.
You can find the scale, procedural guidelines, and guidance on scoring and interpretation here.
6 Books Worth Reading
1. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior (Deci & Ryan, 2014).
It also looks at the processes and structures related to the three innate psychological needs of autonomy, competence, and interpersonal relatedness.
Available on Amazon.
2. Self-Determination Theory in the Clinic (Sheldon, Williams, & Joiner, 2013).
The authors also include numerous specific clinical and case examples to describe the theory’s application.
They show the ways it can be used to motivate patients undergoing treatment for physiological and psychological issues such as diabetes management, smoking cessation, post-traumatic stress, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and depression.
Available on Amazon.
3. Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness (Ryan & Deci, 2018).
Ryan & Deci examine the philosophical and historical considerations related to intrinsic motivation and self-determination in addition to the six mini-theories on which the framework of SDT was built.
Additionally, the authors discuss the application of self-determination theory in multiple domains, including health care, education, sports, virtual environments, and organizations.
Available on Amazon.
4. Self-Determination Theory (SDT): Perspective, Applications, and Impact (Wade, 2017).
Wade discusses the motivational typology in self-determination theory and explores the egoistic side of public service motivation.
Available on Amazon.
5. The Handbook of Self-Determination Research (Deci & Ryan, 2004).
With an emphasis on the importance of self-determination for understanding basic motivational processes and for solving pressing real-world problems, this handbook provides a detailed overview of self-determination theory, explores the current state of self-determination research in relation to other areas of inquiry such as coping, self-esteem, and interest.
Available on Amazon.
6. The Oxford Handbook of Work Motivation, Engagement, and Self-Determination Theory (Gagne (Ed.), 2015).
The Oxford Handbook of Work Motivation, Engagement, and Self-Determination Theory brings together self-determination theory experts and organizational psychology experts who discuss a wide range of topics.
The book provides suggestions for practitioners on how to adjust their programs and practices using self-determination theory principles.
Topics in the handbook include self-determination research and practice, the application of self-determination theory to the field of organizational psychology, suggestions for future research in organizational psychology, and a range of topics related to motivation in the workplace.
If you like book lists, be sure to read this entry on self-esteem books.
A Take-Home Message
We need to feel autonomous – that we are the authors and agents of our own behavior rather than feeling that external forces control our behavior.
Being self-determined and having the autonomy to make choices that shape your future is essential. It means knowing what you want, making choices that are right for you in the moment, and actively making things happen in your own life. When we pursue activities and behaviors that are intrinsically motivated and aligned with our personal goals, we feel happier, more in control, and capable.
I hope you have enjoyed this piece on self-determination – what are your thoughts on the subject? Let us know in the comments.
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
- Deci, E. L. (1992). The relation of interest to the motivation of behavior: A self-determination theory perspective. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 43-70). Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Deci, E. L., Koestelr, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). An analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627-668.
- Deci, EL. & Ryan, RM. (2004). The Handbook of Self-Determination Research. US: University Rochester Press.
- Deci, E. L., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2004). Self-determination theory and basic need satisfaction: Understanding human development in positive psychology. Ricerche di Psichologia, 27, 17– 34.
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology, 49, 14 –23.
- Eisenman, L.Y. (2007). Self-determination interventions: building a foundation for school completion. Remedial and Special Education. 28, 2–8.
- Fernet, C., Guay, F., & Senecal, C. (2004). Adjusting to job demands: The role of work self-determination and job control in predicting burnout. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65, 39–56.
- Field, S. S., Martin, J. E., Miller, R. J., Ward, M., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (1998). Self-determination for persons with disabilities: A position statement of the Division oil Career Development and Transition. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 21, 113-12.
- Gagné, M. (2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 199–223.
- Gagne, M. (2014). The Oxford Handbook of Work Motivation, Engagement, and Self-Determination Theory. UK: Oxford University Press.
- Hui, E. K., & Tsang, S. K. (2012). Self-determination as a psychological and positive youth development construct. TheScientificWorldJournal, 2012, 759358.
- Kapp, C.B. (2001). Self-Regulation in Childhood. International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 13862-13866.
- Kasser, T. & Ryan, R. M. (1996). Further examining the American dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 280–287
- Niemiec, C. P., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2009). The path taken: Consequences of attaining intrinsic and extrinsic aspirations in post‐college life. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 291‐306.
- Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 209-218.
- Ryan, R. M., Kuhl, J., & Deci, E. L. (1997). Nature and autonomy: Organizational view of social and neurobiological aspects of self-regulation in behavior and development. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 701–728.
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55, 68.
- Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L., Grolnick, W.S., & La Guardia, J.G. (2006). The significance of autonomy and autonomy support in psychological development and psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti & D.J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Theory and method (2nd ed., pp. 795–849). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
- Ryan, R.M. & Deci, E.L. (2018). Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. UK: Guilford Press.
- Sheldon, KM., Williams, G., & Joiner, T. (2003). Self-Determination Theory in the Clinic: Motivating Physical and Mental Health. US: Yale University Press.
- Silva, MN., Vieira, PN., Coutinho, SR., Minderico, CS., Matos, MG., Sardinha, LB., & Teixeira, PJ. (2010). Using self-determination theory to promote physical activity and weight control: a randomized controlled trial in women. Journal of Behavior & Medicine, 33, 110-122.
- Silva, M. N., Marques, M. M., & Teixeira, P. J. (2014). Testing theory in practice: The example of self-determination theory-based interventions. European Health Psychologist, 16, 171-180.
- Sugarman, J., & Sokol, B. (2012). Human agency and development: An introduction and theoretical sketch. New Ideas in Psychology, 30, 1–14.
- Sweet, S.N., Fortier, M.S., Strachan, S.M., & Blanchard, C.M. (2012). Testing and Integrating Self-Determination Theory and Self-Efficacy Theory in a Physical Activity Context. Canadian Psychology, 53, 319-327.
- Teixeira, P. J., Silva, M. N., Mata, J., Palmeira, A. L., & Markland, D. (2012). Motivation, self-determination, and long-term weight control. The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 9, 22.
- UNPO: Unrepresented Nations & Peoples Organization. (September 21, 2017). Self-Determination. Retrieved from: https://unpo.org/article/4957
- Wade, S.L. (2017). Self-Determination Theory (SDT): Perspective, Applications, and Impact. Nova Publishers.
- Wehmeyer, M.L. & Kelchner, K. (1995). The Arc’s Self-Determination Scale. The ARC of the United States, Arlington.
- Wehmeyer, M. L., Agran, M., & Hughes, C. (2000). A national survey of teachers’ promotion of self-determination and student-directed learning. Journal of Special Education, 34, 58-68.
- Wehmeyer, M.L. & Palmer, S.B. (2003). Adult Outcomes for Students with Cognitive Disabilities Three-Years After High School: The Impact of Self-Determination. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 131-144.
- Wehmeyer, M.L. (2005). Self-Determination and Individuals With Significant Disabilities: Examining Meanings and Misinterpretations. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30, 113-120.
- Wehmeyer, M.L. (2007). Promoting self-determination in students with developmental disabilities. New York, NY: Guildford Press.
- Zimmerman, B.J. (1990) Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview. Educational Psychologist, 25, 3-17