Dissecting the Research & Validity of the Five-Factor Model
The Big Five personality trait model is widely known and used and has considerable academic support.
But where did it come from?
Research from multiple sources underpins the model and its five traits. Goldberg (1993) adopted 1,710 trait descriptions from a prior study and asked college students to rate themselves on each one.
At the same time, Costa and McCrae (1976) investigated associations and overlaps between multiple personality measure scales across various languages. The results led to an agreed-upon set of key personality traits: openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism (Larsen et al., 2017).
While some decisions regarding the five key traits appear at times arbitrary, the model that arose has proven reasonably reliable. Indeed, the five-factor research has been replicated by multiple researchers with various population samples over several decades (Larsen et al., 2017).
Initially, the Big Five taxonomy was tested by self-rating based on:
- Single-word adjectives
Study participants scored themselves on concepts such as “organized,” “warm,” and “imaginative.”
- Sentences
Individuals rated themselves according to statements such as “My life is fast paced.”
While the five main factors of the model are openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism, each has a subset of facets that help explain the often subtle nuances between personalities (Larsen et al., 2017).
Applying the OCEAN Personality Traits in Professional Contexts
While the Big Five personality trait model offers valuable insights at a personal level, it can also be powerful for practitioners in various professional contexts.
Therapy
In building a solid therapeutic alliance, it can be valuable for counselors to understand a client’s personality profile. By doing so, mental health practitioners can better connect with their issues and needs and promote behavioral change that increases the likelihood of a positive outcome (Dobson & Dozois, 2021).
Coaching
Awareness and understanding of where clients fall within each element of the five-factor model can support more personalized development plans. Each trait can become a strength (Greenberg, 2016).
For example, conscientiousness might be harnessed to support development and growth in the workplace, while extraversion could promote communication and networking. On the other hand, knowing that a client may fall short on agreeableness might result in homework to encourage emotional intelligence to support deeper bonds (Greenberg, 2016).
Human resources
Human resources departments often use Big Five assessments to aid recruitment of key staff.
They attempt to align candidates to job-related personality profiles, improving job satisfaction, reducing staff turnover, and promoting team performance (Jain et al., 2024).
Education
Educational professionals sometimes use the results of personality tests to adapt teaching strategies to align with varied personality-driven learning styles, thus enhancing educational outcomes (Poropat, 2009).
Ongoing research continues to increase our understanding of the connection between personality models and academic success to identify approaches for tailoring learning to individuals’ and groups’ distinct needs, with varying degrees of success (Çağataylı & Çelebi, 2021).
What our readers think
Hm, interesting approach – I’ll try this one out!
I wonder if this analysis along with academic, visual-spatial, social sensitivity,pitch recognition, drawing ability etc could be molded into a good instrument to guide career choices. Many young people have trouble identifying their strengths and weaknesses. Old tests were useless- my friend the nephrologist was told she would be a good factory worker.
This, along with characterization of the traits of the most accomplished people in various fields, could allow teachers to guide students and their experiences- not that it should be substituted for passion for a subject.
I’m grateful for this,although Meyers Briggs has helped me out too. I took a short sample test & think I may have been too high in Openess, because I’m also high in C,E, A, as well as low in N. I should take the 240 questions.
To me the problem with the OCEAN model is that the Big Five have long lists of “positive” traits while the opposite has short “negative” traits. (See for example extroversion compared to introversion). I have noticed this in books on the topic as well. This seems biased to me as if some traits are preferred more than others.
I agree. Sometimes it takes a different environment or situation to appreciate the positives of what we often think of as negatives. One example is ADD and impulsiveness. The people in my life who stepped up in sudden emergencies were also impulsive and distractible. Whether a trait is positive or negative depends on the environment and the values of the people involved.